Mudry A
Service d'ORL, CHUV, Lausanne.
Rev Med Suisse Romande. 2000 Feb;120(2):171-7.
Homoeopathy is not considered as a scientific therapy.
To systematically re-examine research concerning homoeopathy and to analyse whether these works show homoeopathy as being a scientific therapy.
The review of international literature on the subject.
Scientific research on homoeopathy is divided into four principal directions: the demonstration of the clinical activity of homoeopathic medicines, the demonstration of the biological activity of the high dilutions and of the principle of similarity, the research of the mechanical action and the medical conception of homoeopathy. Homoeopathy cannot rest on a fixed doctrine but must be continually brought up to date by medical discoveries and present day science. More and more research in these four domaines is being published in the best international medical journals, providing publicity for homoeopathy and its activities. Up to now, no research has categorically proven that homoeopathy has a specific pharmacological action, consequently it is not a proven scientific therapy.
If homoeopathy wants to be recognised by classical medicine, it must continue its academic research. It is only by doing this that homoeopathy will be accepted by the scientific world.
顺势疗法不被视为一种科学疗法。
系统地重新审视关于顺势疗法的研究,并分析这些研究是否表明顺势疗法是一种科学疗法。
对该主题的国际文献进行综述。
关于顺势疗法的科学研究分为四个主要方向:顺势疗法药物临床活性的论证、高稀释液生物活性及相似性原理的论证、作用机制的研究以及顺势疗法的医学概念。顺势疗法不能基于固定的学说,而必须通过医学发现和当代科学不断更新。在这四个领域越来越多的研究发表于国际顶尖医学期刊,为顺势疗法及其活动进行了宣传。到目前为止,没有研究能明确证明顺势疗法具有特定的药理作用,因此它不是一种已被证实的科学疗法。
如果顺势疗法想要被传统医学认可,就必须继续其学术研究。只有这样,顺势疗法才会被科学界所接受。