Saletu-Zyhlarz G, Anderer P, Brandstätter N, Dantendorfer K, Gruber G, Mandl M, Ritter K, Zoghlami A, Saletu B
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Vienna, Austria.
Neuropsychobiology. 2000;41(3):139-48. doi: 10.1159/000026646.
Recent investigations in our sleep outpatient clinic demonstrated that 30% of patients exhibited organic and 70% nonorganic sleep disorders, with 41% showing as an additional diagnosis neurotic, stress-related, and somatoform disorders, 31% affective disorders and 15% mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use. Thus, the aim of the study was to investigate the acute effects of the imidazopyridine zolpidem on objective and subjective sleep and awakening quality in the largest of the above-mentioned groups. In this single-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study, 15 patients (9 females and 6 males aged 51.1 + 11. 3 years) diagnosed as having nonorganic insomnia (ICD-10: F 51.0) related to neurotic and stress-related disorders (F 1.1:12, F 41.2:2 and F 43.2:1) were included. Objective and subjective sleep and awakening quality measures were investigated in 3 subsequent nights in the sleep laboratory (adaptation, baseline/placebo and zolpidem 10 mg night), utilizing clinical, polysomnographic, psychometric and psychophysiological methods. The drug-free patients were matched according to age and sex with 15 normal healthy controls (age 51.2 + 11.8 years). Statistical analysis of polysomnographic variables demonstrated a significant lengthening of the total sleep period (TSP) and total sleep time (TST), an improvement in sleep efficiency and a shortening of sleep latencies after zolpidem as compared with placebo. These changes were opposite to the differences between patients and controls. Concerning sleep architecture, zolpidem increased the length of S4 and S3 + S4 as compared with placebo. Subjective sleep and awakening quality and the thymopsychic variables drive, mood, affectivity and wakefulness in the morning showed no significant changes, as a significant improvement had already occurred from the adaptation to the baseline/placebo night. Noopsychic variables (attention, concentration, attention variability, numerical memory, fine motor activity, reaction time measures) showed similar findings. Moreover, subjective sleep and awakening quality, thymopsychic and noopsychic measures during baseline/placebo recordings did not differ significantly from normative data (except for fine motor activity). Psychophysiological measures did not show any significant alterations either, except for a decrease in systolic blood pressure in the evening.
As compared with placebo, zolpidem induced a significant improvement in objective sleep quality, mainly by increasing TSP, TST and sleep efficiency and shortening sleep latencies, thereby normalizing the disorder of initiating and maintaining sleep. Deep sleep stages S3 + S4 increased (although at baseline/placebo these stages did not differ from controls), while S1, S2 and SREM did not change significantly. Subjective sleep and awakening quality as well as thymopsychic and noopsychic performance in the morning mainly showed a placebo and 'first- night effect' phenomenon in these patients. Thus, the changes induced by zolpidem were somewhat different from those after classical benzodiazepines.
我们睡眠门诊最近的调查显示,30%的患者表现为器质性睡眠障碍,70%为非器质性睡眠障碍,其中41%还被诊断为神经症、与压力相关及躯体形式障碍,31%为情感障碍,15%为精神活性物质所致精神和行为障碍。因此,本研究的目的是调查咪唑吡啶类药物唑吡坦对上述最大群体中客观和主观睡眠及觉醒质量的急性影响。在这项单盲、安慰剂对照的交叉研究中,纳入了15例被诊断为与神经症和压力相关障碍(F1.1:12,F41.2:2和F43.2:1)相关的非器质性失眠(国际疾病分类第十版:F51.0)患者(9名女性和6名男性,年龄51.1±11.3岁)。在睡眠实验室连续3个晚上(适应期、基线/安慰剂期和每晚服用10mg唑吡坦期),采用临床、多导睡眠图、心理测量和心理生理方法,对客观和主观睡眠及觉醒质量指标进行了研究。无用药的患者按年龄和性别与15名正常健康对照者(年龄51.2±11.8岁)进行匹配。多导睡眠图变量的统计分析表明,与安慰剂相比,唑吡坦治疗后总睡眠时间(TSP)和总睡眠时间(TST)显著延长,睡眠效率提高,睡眠潜伏期缩短。这些变化与患者和对照者之间的差异相反。关于睡眠结构,与安慰剂相比,唑吡坦增加了S4以及S3+S4的时长。主观睡眠和觉醒质量以及早晨的心理精神变量驱动力、情绪、情感和觉醒状态均无显著变化,因为从适应期到基线/安慰剂期已经有了显著改善。心理功能变量(注意力、专注力、注意力变异性、数字记忆、精细运动活动、反应时间测量)也有类似结果。此外,基线/安慰剂记录期间的主观睡眠和觉醒质量、心理精神和心理功能测量与标准数据相比无显著差异(精细运动活动除外)。心理生理测量也未显示任何显著变化,只是晚上收缩压有所下降。
与安慰剂相比,唑吡坦显著改善了客观睡眠质量,主要是通过增加TSP、TST和睡眠效率以及缩短睡眠潜伏期,从而使入睡和维持睡眠的障碍恢复正常。深度睡眠阶段S3+S4增加(尽管在基线/安慰剂期这些阶段与对照者无差异),而S1、S2和快速眼动睡眠(SREM)无显著变化。这些患者早晨的主观睡眠和觉醒质量以及心理精神和心理功能表现主要呈现出安慰剂和“首夜效应”现象。因此,唑吡坦引起的变化与经典苯二氮䓬类药物后的变化有所不同。