Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者双眼黄斑光凝术后通过驾驶员及车辆执照管理局的视野规定。

Passing the DVLA field regulations following bilateral macular photocoagulation in diabetics.

作者信息

Tong L, Vernon S A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2000 Feb;14 ( Pt 1):35-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2000.8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

At present the Driver and Vehicle and Licensing Agency (DVLA) of the UK requires all diabetic patients with laser treatment in both eyes to undergo a binocular driving field assessment. Increasingly we find that many such patients have undergone only macular laser treatment without panretinal photocoagulation. We aimed to ascertain the frequency and causes of failure of the binocular driving field test after bilateral macular laser treatment performed according to a set protocol.

METHODS

A retrospective case notes study was combined with a prospective recall of patients for visual field assessment. All diabetic patients under the care of one consultant who had had bilateral macular laser treatment (without panretinal photocoagulation) over a 4 year period were identified and the case notes studied. Patients who could not achieve a corrected binocular acuity of 6/9 were excluded, as were patients with glaucoma. Patients who had not had the DVLA test were recalled to perform the test, whether or not they had an intention to drive. Failure was defined utilising strict criteria on the Esterman Programme of the Humphrey Analyser.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were identified. Fifty-four were not eligible (21 because of poor acuity, 29 had died or were too ill to participate and 4 for other reasons). Of the 84 who were eligible, 64 had visual fields performed and 20 declined to attend. Sixty-three of 64 tested passed the Esterman test, the one failure having a previously unknown and relatively mild homonymous field defect.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing bilateral macular laser can be counselled that, provided their acuity remains adequate, they have a very low chance of failing the DVLA field regulations.

摘要

目的

目前,英国驾驶与车辆牌照局(DVLA)要求所有接受双眼激光治疗的糖尿病患者进行双眼视野评估。我们越来越多地发现,许多此类患者仅接受了黄斑激光治疗,而未进行全视网膜光凝。我们旨在确定按照既定方案进行双侧黄斑激光治疗后双眼视野测试失败的频率及原因。

方法

一项回顾性病例记录研究与一项前瞻性患者召回视野评估相结合。确定了在一位顾问医生照料下、在4年期间接受双侧黄斑激光治疗(未进行全视网膜光凝)的所有糖尿病患者,并对其病例记录进行研究。排除矫正双眼视力无法达到6/9的患者以及青光眼患者。无论是否有驾驶意愿,未进行DVLA测试的患者均被召回进行测试。根据Humphrey分析仪的Esterman程序,采用严格标准定义失败情况。

结果

共确定了138例患者。54例不符合条件(21例因视力差,29例已死亡或病情太重无法参与,4例因其他原因)。在84例符合条件的患者中,64例进行了视野检查,20例拒绝参加。在接受测试的64例患者中,63例通过了Esterman测试,1例失败患者有此前未知且相对较轻的同侧视野缺损。

结论

对于接受双侧黄斑激光治疗的患者,可以告知他们,只要视力保持足够,他们不符合DVLA视野规定的几率非常低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验