一项评估初级保健中计算机化决策支持的随机对照试验的设计与分析：COGENT研究。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

The design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate computerized decision support in primary care: the COGENT study.

作者信息

Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Steen N, Parkin D, Purves I, McColl E, Rousseau N

机构信息

Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2000 Apr;17(2):180-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.180.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/17.2.180

PMID:10758083

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

The design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate computerized decision support in primary care: the COGENT study.一项评估初级保健中计算机化决策支持的随机对照试验的设计与分析：COGENT研究。

Fam Pract. 2000 Apr;17(2):180-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.180.

Analysis of cluster randomized trials in primary care: a practical approach.基层医疗中整群随机试验的分析：一种实用方法。

Fam Pract. 2000 Apr;17(2):192-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.192.

Rational prescribing in primary care (RaPP): economic evaluation of an intervention to improve professional practice.基层医疗中的合理用药（RaPP）：一项改善专业实践干预措施的经济评估

PLoS Med. 2006 Jun;3(6):e216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030216.

Sample size calculations for intervention trials in primary care randomizing by primary care group: an empirical illustration from one proposed intervention trial.按初级保健组进行随机分组的初级保健干预试验的样本量计算：一项拟议干预试验的实证说明

Stat Med. 2001 Feb 15;20(3):367-76. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<367::aid-sim798>3.0.co;2-r.

Rudiments of subgroup analyses.亚组分析基础。

Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Jan-Feb;54(4):338-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2011.07.005.

Over-AVID subgroup analysis.过度高亲和力亚组分析。

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Nov 1;38(5):1586-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01679-5.

Clinical practice guidelines on trial.试验临床实践指南。

CMAJ. 1997 Jun 15;156(12):1725-7.

Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations.英格兰和威尔士全科医疗试验中集群大小不均：对样本量计算的影响。

Stat Med. 2001 Feb 15;20(3):377-90. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<377::aid-sim799>3.0.co;2-n.

[Roaming through methodology. IX. The interpretation of subgroup analyses].[方法学漫谈。IX. 亚组分析的解读]

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Oct 10;142(41):2245-7.

Why most randomized controlled trials are irrelevant: And why yours will not be.为何大多数随机对照试验毫无意义：以及为何你的试验不会如此。

Can Fam Physician. 2015 Sep;61(9):811-2.

引用本文的文献

User Experience Design for Adoption of Asthma Clinical Decision Support Tools.用于采用哮喘临床决策支持工具的用户体验设计

Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Aug;13(4):971-982. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757292. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

Stratified care integrated with eHealth versus usual primary care physiotherapy in patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.针对颈部和/或肩部不适患者，分层护理联合电子健康与常规初级保健物理治疗的比较：一项整群随机对照试验方案

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 5;22(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03989-0.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stratified blended physiotherapy in patients with non-specific low back pain: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.分层混合物理治疗对非特异性下腰痛患者的有效性和成本效益：一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 22;21(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3174-z.

Effectiveness of a Blended Multidisciplinary Intervention for Patients with Moderate Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms (PARASOL): Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.针对中度医学无法解释的身体症状患者的综合多学科干预措施（PARASOL）的有效性：一项整群随机临床试验方案

JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 May 8;7(5):e120. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9404.

Interventions to Educate Family Physicians to Change Test Ordering: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.教育家庭医生改变检查医嘱的干预措施：随机对照试验的系统评价

Acad Pathol. 2016 Mar 4;3:2374289516633476. doi: 10.1177/2374289516633476. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.

Risks to patient safety associated with implementation of electronic applications for medication management in ambulatory care--a systematic review.在门诊护理中实施电子药物管理应用程序与患者安全相关的风险——系统评价。

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Dec 5;13:133. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-133.

The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials.《关于群组随机对照试验的伦理设计和实施的渥太华声明》。

PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001346. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

Implementation of electronic medical records: theory-informed qualitative study.电子病历的实施：理论导向的定性研究。

Can Fam Physician. 2011 Oct;57(10):e390-7.

The impact of adding an extra dimension to a preference-based measure.增加偏好测量维度的影响。

Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(2):245-53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.026. Epub 2011 Jun 2.

Prioritizing comparative effectiveness research: are drug and implementation trials equally worth funding?优先开展药物和实施效果比较的研究：药物试验和实施试验的资助价值是否等同？

Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jul;29(7):555-61. doi: 10.2165/11588330-000000000-00000.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验