• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿德福韦、替诺福韦、L-FMAU、DAPD、喷昔洛韦和洛布卡韦对人乙型肝炎病毒DNA聚合酶M550V突变变体复制的抑制作用。

Inhibition of the replication of the DNA polymerase M550V mutation variant of human hepatitis B virus by adefovir, tenofovir, L-FMAU, DAPD, penciclovir and lobucavir.

作者信息

Ying C, De Clercq E, Nicholson W, Furman P, Neyts J

机构信息

Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Viral Hepat. 2000 Mar;7(2):161-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2000.00210.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2893.2000.00210.x
PMID:10760047
Abstract

Several nucleoside analogues (penciclovir, lobucavir, dioxalane guanine [DXG], 1-beta-2,6-diaminopurine dioxalane [DAPD], L-FMAU, lamivudine) and acyclic nucleoside phosphonate analogues (adefovir, tenofovir) that are in clinical use, in clinical trials or under preclinical development for the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections, were evaluated for their inhibitory effect on the replication of a la- mivudine-resistant HBV variant containing the methionine --> valine substitution (M550V) in the polymerase nucleoside-binding domain. The antiviral activity was determined in the tetracycline-responsive HepAD38 and HepAD79 cells, which are stably transfected with either a cDNA copy of the wild-type pregenomic RNA or with cDNA containing the M550V mutation. As expected, lamivudine was much less ( approximately 200-fold) effective at inhibiting replication of the M550V mutant virus than the wild-type virus. In contrast, adefovir, tenofovir, lobucavir, L-FMAU, DXG and DAPD proved almost equally effective against both viruses. A second objective of this study was to directly compare the antiviral potency of the anti-HBV agents in HepG2 2.2.15 cells (which are routinely used for anti-HBV drug-screening purposes) with that in HepAD38 cells. HepAD38 cells produce much larger quantities of HBV than HepG2 2.2.15 cells, and thus allow drug screening in a multiwell plate format. All compounds were found to be almost equally effective at inhibiting HBV replication in HepAD38 cells (as in HepG2 2.2.15 cells), except for penciclovir, which was clearly less effective in HepAD38 cells.

摘要

对几种正在临床使用、处于临床试验阶段或处于临床前开发阶段用于治疗乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染的核苷类似物(喷昔洛韦、洛布卡韦、二氧杂环戊烷鸟嘌呤[DXG]、1-β-2,6-二氨基嘌呤二氧杂环戊烷[DAPD]、L-FMAU、拉米夫定)和无环核苷膦酸酯类似物(阿德福韦、替诺福韦),评估了它们对一种在聚合酶核苷结合域含有甲硫氨酸→缬氨酸取代(M550V)的拉米夫定耐药HBV变异体复制的抑制作用。抗病毒活性在四环素反应性HepAD38和HepAD79细胞中测定,这些细胞分别稳定转染了野生型前基因组RNA的cDNA拷贝或含有M550V突变的cDNA。正如预期的那样,拉米夫定抑制M550V突变病毒复制的效果比野生型病毒低得多(约200倍)。相比之下,阿德福韦、替诺福韦、洛布卡韦、L-FMAU、DXG和DAPD对两种病毒的抑制效果几乎相同。本研究的第二个目的是直接比较抗HBV药物在HepG2 2.2.15细胞(常用于抗HBV药物筛选)中的抗病毒效力与在HepAD38细胞中的抗病毒效力。HepAD38细胞产生的HBV比HepG2 2.2.15细胞多得多,因此可以在多孔板形式下进行药物筛选。除喷昔洛韦在HepAD38细胞中明显效果较差外,所有化合物在抑制HepAD38细胞(与HepG2 2.2.15细胞一样)中的HBV复制方面几乎同样有效。

相似文献

1
Inhibition of the replication of the DNA polymerase M550V mutation variant of human hepatitis B virus by adefovir, tenofovir, L-FMAU, DAPD, penciclovir and lobucavir.阿德福韦、替诺福韦、L-FMAU、DAPD、喷昔洛韦和洛布卡韦对人乙型肝炎病毒DNA聚合酶M550V突变变体复制的抑制作用。
J Viral Hepat. 2000 Mar;7(2):161-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2000.00210.x.
2
In vitro susceptibilities of wild-type or drug-resistant hepatitis B virus to (-)-beta-D-2,6-diaminopurine dioxolane and 2'-fluoro-5-methyl-beta-L-arabinofuranosyluracil.野生型或耐药乙型肝炎病毒对(-)-β-D-2,6-二氨基嘌呤二氧戊环和2'-氟-5-甲基-β-L-阿拉伯呋喃糖基尿嘧啶的体外敏感性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Sep;45(9):2495-501. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.9.2495-2501.2001.
3
Lamivudine, adefovir and tenofovir exhibit long-lasting anti-hepatitis B virus activity in cell culture.
J Viral Hepat. 2000 Jan;7(1):79-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2000.00192.x.
4
Inhibitory activity of dioxolane purine analogs on wild-type and lamivudine-resistant mutants of hepadnaviruses.二氧戊环嘌呤类似物对嗜肝DNA病毒野生型及拉米夫定耐药突变体的抑制活性。
Hepatology. 2002 Sep;36(3):710-22. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.35070.
5
Molecular modeling and biochemical characterization reveal the mechanism of hepatitis B virus polymerase resistance to lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC).分子建模和生化特性揭示了乙肝病毒聚合酶对拉米夫定(3TC)和恩曲他滨(FTC)耐药的机制。
J Virol. 2001 May;75(10):4771-9. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.10.4771-4779.2001.
6
Sensitivity of L-(-)2,3-dideoxythiacytidine resistant hepatitis B virus to other antiviral nucleoside analogues.L-(-)2,3-二脱氧硫代胞苷耐药乙型肝炎病毒对其他抗病毒核苷类似物的敏感性。
Biochem Pharmacol. 1999 Jun 15;57(12):1351-9. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00073-8.
7
Ribavirin and mycophenolic acid potentiate the activity of guanine- and diaminopurine-based nucleoside analogues against hepatitis B virus.利巴韦林和霉酚酸增强鸟嘌呤和二氨基嘌呤类核苷类似物对乙型肝炎病毒的活性。
Antiviral Res. 2000 Nov;48(2):117-24. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(00)00121-2.
8
In vitro susceptibility of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus to adefovir and tenofovir.拉米夫定耐药乙型肝炎病毒对阿德福韦和替诺福韦的体外敏感性
Antivir Ther. 2004 Jun;9(3):353-63.
9
Susceptibility of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus to other reverse transcriptase inhibitors.拉米夫定耐药乙型肝炎病毒对其他逆转录酶抑制剂的敏感性。
J Clin Invest. 1999 Jun;103(12):1635-40. doi: 10.1172/JCI5882.
10
The rtA194T polymerase mutation impacts viral replication and susceptibility to tenofovir in hepatitis B e antigen-positive and hepatitis B e antigen-negative hepatitis B virus strains.rtA194T聚合酶突变影响乙肝e抗原阳性和乙肝e抗原阴性乙肝病毒株的病毒复制及对替诺福韦的敏感性。
Hepatology. 2009 Apr;49(4):1158-65. doi: 10.1002/hep.22790.

引用本文的文献

1
Building Metabolically Stable and Potent Anti-HIV Thioether-Lipid Analogues of Tenofovir Exalidex: A thorough Pharmacological Analysis.构建代谢稳定且强效的抗 HIV 硫醚脂质类似物替诺福韦艾拉酚胺:全面的药理学分析。
J Med Chem. 2024 Oct 24;67(20):18204-18220. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01510. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
Reduction Sensitive Lipid Conjugates of Tenofovir: Synthesis, Stability, and Antiviral Activity.替诺福韦的还原敏感脂质缀合物:合成、稳定性及抗病毒活性
J Med Chem. 2016 Aug 11;59(15):7097-110. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00428. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
3
Comparison of the efficacy of tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir-based combination therapy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
替诺福韦单药治疗与基于替诺福韦的联合治疗在阿德福韦治疗过的慢性乙型肝炎患者中的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):20111-22. eCollection 2015.
4
Efficacy and safety of tenofovir-based rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients with previous nucleo(s/t)ide treatment failure.基于替诺福韦的挽救治疗对既往核苷(酸)治疗失败的慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效和安全性。
Gut Liver. 2014 Jan;8(1):64-9. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.1.64. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
5
Current Antiviral Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis B: Efficacy and Safety.慢性乙型肝炎的当前抗病毒治疗:疗效与安全性
Curr Hepat Rep. 2011 Dec;10(4):235-243. doi: 10.1007/s11901-011-0109-z. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
6
Telbivudine in combination with adefovir versus adefovir monotherapy in HBeAg-positive, lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B.替比夫定联合阿德福韦酯与阿德福韦酯单药治疗HBeAg阳性、拉米夫定耐药慢性乙型肝炎的比较
Hepatol Int. 2012 Oct;6(4):696-706. doi: 10.1007/s12072-011-9314-7. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
7
Unsuccessful therapy with adefovir and entecavir-tenofovir in a patient with chronic hepatitis B infection with previous resistance to lamivudine: a fourteen-year evolution of hepatitis B virus mutations.阿德福韦酯和恩替卡韦替诺福韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎感染患者失败,该患者先前对拉米夫定耐药:乙型肝炎病毒突变的十四年演变。
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Jun 22;11:178. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-178.
8
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B monoinfection.替诺福韦酯治疗慢性乙型肝炎单一感染
Hepatol Int. 2013 Jun;7(2):327-34. doi: 10.1007/s12072-011-9282-y. Epub 2011 Jun 19.
9
Current therapeutic strategies for recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation.肝移植后乙型肝炎病毒再感染的治疗策略。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 May 28;16(20):2468-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i20.2468.
10
Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between amdoxovir and reduced- and standard-dose zidovudine in HIV-1-infected individuals.在 HIV-1 感染者中,amdoxovir 与齐多夫定低剂量和标准剂量之间不存在药代动力学相互作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Mar;54(3):1248-55. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01209-09. Epub 2009 Dec 28.