Goebel J A, Isipradit P, Hanson J M
Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Srugery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2000 Apr;110(4):517-35. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200004000-00004.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Manual whole-body and head-on-body rotational testing of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) is comparable to conventional rotary chair methods with and without visual fixation from 0.025 to 1 Hz.
Summary of four previously published trials from our laboratory and a fifth prospective blinded study comparing whole-body and head-on-body rotation with rotational chair results from 0.025 to 1 Hz in 10 patients with bilateral vestibular dysfunction.
Subjects were fitted with standard electro-oculogram (EOG) electrodes and placed in the rotary chair for testing at 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 Hz in the dark (VOR) and in the light with a stationary target (VVOR). They were then placed in an otolaryngology examination, chair where an adjustable headband containing the velocity sensor and an opaque visor were placed on the forehead. Whole-body rotational trials from 0.025 to 1 Hz and both passive and active head-on-body trials from 0.25 to 1 Hz were performed with and without visual fixation. Data from each frequency were analyzed cycle-by-cycle and averaged for gain, phase, and asymmetry. These values were then compared to the results obtained during rotational chair testing.
Throughout the five studies, no systematic differences were noted between the manual rotational methods and the rotary chair results. Specifically, no consistent effect of volition or cervico-ocular reflex (COR) enhancement was demonstrated.
Manual rotational testing is a reliable technique for measuring the VOR up to 1 Hz as compared with standard rotary chair methods. Advantages to this technique include portability, lower equipment costs, and potential application up to 6 Hz using head-on-body rotation.
目的/假设:对前庭眼反射(VOR)进行手动全身及头部相对于身体的旋转测试,在0.025至1Hz频率范围内,无论有无视觉注视,其结果与传统转椅测试方法相当。
总结了我们实验室之前发表的四项试验以及第五项前瞻性双盲研究,该研究比较了10例双侧前庭功能障碍患者在0.025至1Hz频率下全身及头部相对于身体的旋转与转椅测试结果。
受试者佩戴标准眼电图(EOG)电极,置于转椅中,分别在黑暗环境下(VOR)以及有固定目标的明亮环境下(VVOR),以0.025、0.05、0.1、0.25、0.5和1Hz的频率进行测试。然后将他们置于耳鼻喉科检查椅上,在前额放置一个装有速度传感器的可调节头带和一个不透明遮阳板。在有和没有视觉注视的情况下,分别进行了0.025至1Hz的全身旋转试验以及0.25至1Hz的被动和主动头部相对于身体的试验。对每个频率的数据逐周期进行分析,并对增益、相位和不对称性进行平均。然后将这些值与转椅测试期间获得的结果进行比较。
在这五项研究中,未发现手动旋转方法与转椅测试结果之间存在系统性差异。具体而言,未证明意志或颈眼反射(COR)增强有一致的影响。
与标准转椅方法相比,手动旋转测试是一种可靠的技术,可用于测量高达1Hz的VOR。该技术的优点包括便携性、较低的设备成本以及使用头部相对于身体的旋转在高达6Hz频率下的潜在应用。