Kuriyan M, Fox E
Transfusion Services, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Vox Sang. 2000;78(2):113-8. doi: 10.1159/000031160.
A crossmatch is usual in pretransfusion testing, but we eliminated it at our tertiary care university hospital. In place of the crossmatch, we have introduced a system where, if an antibody screen is negative, two technologists confirm the ABO of the same patient sample, and we release blood of the patient's type without a serologic or electronic crossmatch.
In 65,628 samples received for pretransfusion testing, we studied the effect of common errors that occur from the time of receipt of a sample until release of the blood unit, in order to decide if elimination of the serologic crossmatch would affect patient safety. All sample labels were inspected for acceptability.
A total of 1,082 (1.64%) samples were rejected for mislabeling. Discordance in patient ABO typing results between two technologists was 0.43%. Such discrepancies were resolved before the release of blood units. No donor unit mislabeling or unit release errors were detected.
Elimination of the crossmatch for red cell antibody-negative patients is safe provided a system of error detection is used. This enhances patient care through the quicker release of blood, increased laboratory efficiency and decreased costs.
交叉配血是输血前检测的常规项目,但我们在三级医疗大学医院取消了这一项目。取而代之的是,我们引入了一种系统,即如果抗体筛查呈阴性,两名技术人员确认同一患者样本的ABO血型,然后我们在不进行血清学或电子交叉配血的情况下发放患者血型的血液。
在65628份接受输血前检测的样本中,我们研究了从样本接收至血液发放期间常见错误的影响,以确定取消血清学交叉配血是否会影响患者安全。检查所有样本标签的可接受性。
共有1082份(1.64%)样本因标签错误被拒收。两名技术人员之间患者ABO血型分型结果的不一致率为0.43%。这些差异在血液发放前得到了解决。未检测到供体单位标签错误或单位发放错误。
如果使用错误检测系统,取消红细胞抗体阴性患者的交叉配血是安全的。这通过更快地发放血液、提高实验室效率和降低成本来改善患者护理。