Aaltonen M, Kuopio T, Laine J, Alanen K, Juhola M, Collan Y
Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Finland.
Anticancer Res. 2000 Jan-Feb;20(1B):547-51.
Evaluation of nuclear DNA staining intensity from histological breast cancer sections has not always been accepted, because of the difficulties in interpreting the histograms. One reason for this is the lack of evidence based interpretation guidelines.
The DNA staining intensity of 140 breast cancer samples was measured with flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM). The methods were compared by using grading efficiency (GE).
First, the ICM histograms were evaluated with a computer assisted image cytometry system using different cut off points for aneuploidy. The GE results varied from 67.9-76.4%. Subjective interpretation and evaluation according two previously published interpretation methods did not improve the GE. Secondly, we excluded histograms which showed clearly different cell clones in FCM and ICM. The GE of remaining histograms was 77.9%. Comparison of these histograms allowed formulation of interpretation guidelines which improved the GE to 85.3%.
This study suggests that efficient interpretation guidelines of section-based DNA histograms can be created.
由于在解读组织学乳腺癌切片的核DNA染色强度直方图时存在困难,对其评估一直未得到广泛认可。造成这种情况的一个原因是缺乏基于证据的解读指南。
采用流式细胞术(FCM)和图像细胞术(ICM)对140例乳腺癌样本的DNA染色强度进行测量。通过分级效率(GE)对这两种方法进行比较。
首先,使用计算机辅助图像细胞术系统对ICM直方图进行评估,采用不同的非整倍体截断点。GE结果在67.9%至76.4%之间变化。根据之前发表的两种解读方法进行主观解读和评估并未提高GE。其次,我们排除了在FCM和ICM中显示明显不同细胞克隆的直方图。其余直方图的GE为77.9%。对这些直方图进行比较后制定了解读指南,使GE提高到85.3%。
本研究表明,可以创建基于切片的DNA直方图的有效解读指南。