Persinger M A
Department of Psychology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Feb;90(1):25-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.1.25.
The personality scores from Cattell's 16 PF for 188 patients who had been referred for neuropsychological assessment following motor vehicle incidents were analyzed as a function of the severity of neuropsychological impairment (Halstead-Reitan Index) and time since the injury. Patients who were impaired (Index > 0.4) exhibited lower scores on Factor B (moe concrete thinking), Factor E (more submissive), and Factor F (more cautious) than patients who were not impaired. The presence of impairment accommodated only 10% of the variance in Factor E scores, associated with the largest group difference. There were no significant differences between scores on any of the personality factors, verbal intelligence, or standardized reading ability as a function of time since the injury.
对188名在机动车事故后被转介进行神经心理学评估的患者，根据卡特尔16种人格因素问卷（16 PF）得出的人格分数，按照神经心理学损伤的严重程度（霍尔斯特德-雷坦指数）和受伤后的时间进行了分析。与未受损患者相比，受损患者（指数> 0.4）在因素B（具体思维更多）、因素E（更顺从）和因素F（更谨慎）上得分较低。损伤的存在仅解释了因素E得分中10%的方差，该因素与最大的组间差异相关。在任何人格因素、言语智力或标准化阅读能力的得分上，均未发现与受伤后的时间存在显著差异。
