Cheramie G M, Griffin K M, Morgan T
School Psychology Program, University of Houston-Clear Lake, TX 77058-1098, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Feb;90(1):250-2. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.1.250.
A national survey of specialist school psychologists examined the perceived usefulness of assessment techniques in making decisions regarding eligibility for the educational classification of emotional disturbance and in generating classroom recommendations. Analysis showed measures rated as most useful were interviews with the parent, teacher, and student, observations of the student, and norm-referenced rating scales. Projective techniques were least useful. These findings are important in the context of "best practices" for the multidimensional assessment of emotional disturbance which promotes a more direct link between assessment and intervention.
一项针对专科学校心理学家的全国性调查,考察了评估技术在做出关于情绪障碍教育分类资格的决策以及提出课堂建议方面的感知有用性。分析表明,被评为最有用的措施是与家长、教师和学生的面谈、对学生的观察以及常模参照评定量表。投射技术最没用。在情绪障碍多维评估的“最佳实践”背景下,这些发现很重要,因为它促进了评估与干预之间更直接的联系。