• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估建筑设计评审。

Evaluating architectural design review.

作者信息

Stamps A E

机构信息

Institute of Environmental Quality, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Feb;90(1):265-71. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.1.265.

DOI:10.2466/pms.2000.90.1.265
PMID:10769909
Abstract

Architectural design review is a method of environmental management which is widely used by governmental agencies in both the United States and in Great Britain. Because design review is a governmental function, there is a major need to assess how well it works. Research covering over 29,000 respondents and 5,600 environmental scenes suggests that scientific protocols can be adapted to provide an accurate and efficient design review protocol. The protocol uses preference experiments to find the standardized mean difference [formula: see text] between a proposed project and a random sample of existing projects. Values of d will indicate whether the project will increase, maintain, or diminish the aesthetic merit of the sampled area. The protocol is illustrated by applying it to the case of design review for a single residence. Implications for further implementations are discussed.

摘要

建筑设计审查是一种环境管理方法,在美国和英国都被政府机构广泛使用。由于设计审查是政府职能,因此非常有必要评估其运作效果。一项涵盖超过29000名受访者和5600个环境场景的研究表明,可以调整科学方案以提供准确且高效的设计审查方案。该方案使用偏好实验来找出拟议项目与现有项目随机样本之间的标准化平均差异[公式:见原文]。d值将表明该项目会增加、维持还是降低采样区域的美学价值。通过将该方案应用于单个住宅的设计审查案例进行了说明。并讨论了进一步实施的影响。

相似文献

1
Evaluating architectural design review.评估建筑设计评审。
Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Feb;90(1):265-71. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.1.265.
2
Emerging science of evidence-based design (EBD).
HERD. 2008 Spring;1(3):128-9.
3
Community mobility in the context of universal design: inter-professional collaboration and education.通用设计背景下的社区出行:跨专业协作与教育
Aust Occup Ther J. 2012 Oct;59(5):375-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00965.x. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
4
Architectural determinism. Does design change behaviour?建筑决定论。设计会改变行为吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Mar;52(476):252-3.
5
How Juries Assess Universal Design in Norwegian Architectural School Competitions.挪威建筑学院竞赛中评审团如何评估通用设计
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;229:229-39.
6
New and improved. Eighth annual competition honors architectural projects that build on changes in healthcare delivery.
Mod Healthc. 1993 Nov 1;23(44):39-42, 44, 46-51.
7
Envisioning excellence: an architectural approach to healthcare facility planning and design.
J Hosp Mark. 1995;9(2):121-40.
8
Of time and preference: temporal stability of environmental preferences.关于时间与偏好:环境偏好的时间稳定性
Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Dec;85(3 Pt 1):883-96. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.85.3.883.
9
Creativity rules. Design winners use architectural themes successfully.创意为王。设计优胜者成功运用了建筑主题。
Mod Healthc. 2005 Sep 26;35(39):26-8, 30, 32-4.
10
1990 architectural design awards.
Contemp Longterm Care. 1990 Jun;13(6):31-40.