Davis R, Overton J D
Keesler Air Force Base, Miss., Ocean Springs 39564-9707, USA.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Apr;131(4):469-78. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0203.
This clinical study compared the efficacy of adhesive-retained vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations in the treatment of molars with incomplete fractures. Both relief of chewing pain and cold sensitivity were evaluated at two weeks, three months and one year.
The authors treated 38 patients with a chief complaint of chewing sensitivity on vital molar teeth (40 teeth in the study). A random-number generator determined the treatment method for each tooth. Twenty teeth received bonded amalgam restorations. Twenty teeth received amalgapins or threaded pins to retain the amalgam. Teeth were evaluated for postoperative chewing sensitivity. A visual analog pain scale was used to evaluate cold response to a skin-refrigerant-soaked cotton pellet at each visit. After 12 months, all 40 teeth were available for evaluation.
Chewing pain was completely eliminated in all but one tooth. A Student's t-test found no significant difference (P > .05) in preoperative cold sensitivity between the bonded and nonbonded groups. A paired t-test comparison indicated that the teeth in the bonded group were significantly less sensitive to cold after three months and 12 months than they were at the time of the baseline measurements (P < .0001). A paired t-test indicated no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative cold sensitivity scores for teeth in the nonbonded group (P > .05).
Both adhesively bonded and mechanically retained complex amalgam restorations were successful in resolving chewing sensitivity in cracked molars. For 39 of 40 teeth, chewing sensitivity did not return during the one-year follow-up period. At three months and 12 months, cold sensitivity was reduced in the bonded restorations. At all three time periods, cold sensitivity remained similar to baseline levels for the mechanically retained restorations.
Incomplete tooth fracture in molars can be successfully treated by covering fractured cusps with amalgam restorations. This study excluded teeth with prolonged sensitivity to a cold stimulus or those with periodontal evidence of root fracture. With these exclusions, elimination of chewing sensitivity was predictable. Teeth restored with bonded restorations experienced a decrease in sensitivity to a cold stimulus at three months and at 12 months, but not at two weeks. The cold sensitivity of teeth restored with nonbonded restorations was similar at baseline, two weeks, three months and one year.
本临床研究比较了粘结固位与针固位复合银汞合金修复体治疗磨牙不完全骨折的疗效。在两周、三个月和一年时评估咀嚼痛缓解情况及冷敏感情况。
作者治疗了38例主诉活髓磨牙咀嚼敏感的患者(研究中共有40颗牙齿)。通过随机数字生成器确定每颗牙齿的治疗方法。20颗牙齿接受粘结银汞合金修复。20颗牙齿接受银汞钉或螺纹钉固位银汞合金修复。评估牙齿术后的咀嚼敏感性。每次复诊时使用视觉模拟疼痛量表评估对浸有皮肤制冷剂的棉球的冷反应。12个月后,所有40颗牙齿均可供评估。
除一颗牙齿外,所有牙齿的咀嚼痛均完全消除。学生t检验发现粘结组和非粘结组术前冷敏感无显著差异(P>.05)。配对t检验比较表明,粘结组牙齿在三个月和12个月时对冷的敏感性明显低于基线测量时(P<.0001)。配对t检验表明非粘结组牙齿术前和术后冷敏感评分无显著差异(P>.05)。
粘结固位和机械固位的复合银汞合金修复体在解决隐裂磨牙的咀嚼敏感方面均取得成功。在40颗牙齿中的39颗,咀嚼敏感在一年随访期内未复发。在三个月和12个月时,粘结修复体的冷敏感降低。在所有三个时间段,机械固位修复体的冷敏感仍与基线水平相似。
磨牙不完全骨折可通过用银汞合金修复体覆盖骨折牙尖成功治疗。本研究排除了对冷刺激长期敏感的牙齿或有根折牙周证据的牙齿。排除这些情况后,咀嚼敏感的消除是可预测的。粘结修复体修复的牙齿在三个月和12个月时对冷刺激的敏感性降低,但在两周时未降低。非粘结修复体修复的牙齿在基线、两周、三个月和一年时的冷敏感相似。