Stern S E, Mullennix J W, Dyson C, Wilson S J
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown, PA 15904, USA.
Hum Factors. 1999 Dec;41(4):588-95. doi: 10.1518/001872099779656680.
Is computer-synthesized speech as persuasive as the human voice when presenting an argument? After completing an attitude pretest, 193 participants were randomly assigned to listen to a persuasive appeal under three conditions: a high-quality synthesized speech system (DECtalk Express), a low-quality synthesized speech system (Monologue), and a tape recording of a human voice. Following the appeal, participants completed a posttest attitude survey and a series of questionnaires designed to assess perceptions of speech qualities, perceptions of the speaker, and perceptions of the message. The human voice was generally perceived more favorably than the computer-synthesized voice, and the speaker was perceived more favorably when the voice was a human voice than when it was computer synthesized. There was, however, no evidence that computerized speech, as compared with the human voice, affected persuasion or perceptions of the message. Actual or potential applications of this research include issues that should be considered when designing synthetic speech systems.
在进行论证时,计算机合成语音与人类声音一样具有说服力吗?在完成态度预测试后,193名参与者被随机分配在三种条件下收听一段有说服力的呼吁:一个高质量的合成语音系统(DECtalk Express)、一个低质量的合成语音系统(Monologue)以及一段人类声音的录音。在听完呼吁后,参与者完成了一次测试后态度调查以及一系列旨在评估语音质量感知、说话者感知和信息感知的问卷。与计算机合成语音相比,人类声音通常被更积极地看待,并且当声音是人类声音时,说话者比声音是计算机合成时被更积极地看待。然而,没有证据表明与人类声音相比,计算机语音会影响说服力或对信息的感知。这项研究的实际或潜在应用包括在设计合成语音系统时应考虑的问题。