• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Human papillomaviruses and vulvar vestibulitis.

作者信息

Morin C, Bouchard C, Brisson J, Fortier M, Blanchette C, Meisels A

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Cytology, Quebec City, Canada.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;95(5):683-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00623-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00623-7
PMID:10775729
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and vulvar vestibulitis syndrome.

METHODS

From November 1995 to December 1997, 135 women with vulvar vestibulitis were compared with 322 controls who had no evidence of vulvar vestibulitis. Human papillomavirus DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and detected with liquid-capture molecular assay.

RESULTS

Human papillomavirus DNA was found in 29.6% of cases and in 23.9% of controls (relative risk [RR] 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI].8, 2.2). The prevalence of HPV tended to decrease with increasing duration of pain among cases. Thus, prevalences were 37. 5%, 29.6%, and 22.0% for pain durations of 3-6 months, 7-12 months, and 13-24 months, respectively (P =.14). Prevalence of HPV also tended to increase with pain intensity among cases, but that association was not statistically significant (P =.57). Prevalence percentages for women with low, moderate, or severe pain were 27.5%, 28.8%, and 34.4%, respectively. Prevalence of HPV was slightly higher in cases with the most severe pain (34.4%) than in controls (23.9%) (RR 1.8; 95% CI.8, 4.0). In cases with the most pain in the shortest time (3-6 months), prevalence of HPV was double that of controls (50% versus 23.9%) (RR 3.5; 95% CI 1.0, 12.7; P =.054).

CONCLUSION

There was little support for the idea that HPV might be related to vulvar vestibulitis.

摘要

相似文献

1
Human papillomaviruses and vulvar vestibulitis.
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;95(5):683-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00623-7.
2
Human papillomavirus in vulvar vestibulitis syndrome.外阴前庭炎综合征中的人乳头瘤病毒
J Reprod Med. 2007 Jun;52(6):485-9.
3
Polymerase chain reaction search for viral etiology of vulvar vestibulitis syndrome.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):139-44. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70263-6.
4
Human papillomavirus vulvitis: a new disease or an unfortunate mistake?人乳头瘤病毒外阴炎:一种新疾病还是一个不幸的误诊?
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Nov;101(11):992-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13046.x.
5
Vulvar vestibulitis. Lack of evidence for a human papillomavirus etiology.
J Reprod Med. 1994 Dec;39(12):936-8.
6
Telomerase activity in HPV-associated vulvar vestibulitis.
J Reprod Med. 2000 Aug;45(8):643-8.
7
Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist gene polymorphism in women with vulvar vestibulitis.外阴前庭炎女性白细胞介素1受体拮抗剂基因多态性
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Feb;182(2):283-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70212-2.
8
Severe vulvar vestibulitis. Relation to HPV infection.
J Reprod Med. 1997 Aug;42(8):514-8.
9
A repetitive DNA sequence that characterizes human papillomavirus integration site into the human genome is present in vulvar vestibulitis.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000 Apr;89(2):173-6. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00209-2.
10
Vulvar vestibulitis is rarely associated with human papillomavirus infection types 6, 11, 16, or 18.
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1993 Oct;12(4):344-9. doi: 10.1097/00004347-199310000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
[Review of the literature on the psychoemotional reality of women with vulvodynia: difficulties met and strategies developed].[关于外阴痛女性心理情绪现实的文献综述:遇到的困难及制定的策略]
Pain Res Manag. 2008 May-Jun;13(3):255-63. doi: 10.1155/2008/801019.
2
Case-control study of vulvar vestibulitis risk associated with genital infections.与生殖器感染相关的外阴前庭炎风险的病例对照研究
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2002;10(4):193-202. doi: 10.1155/S1064744902000224.