• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Vocational students' learning preferences: the interpretability of ipsative data.

作者信息

Smith P J

机构信息

Deakin University, Australia.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2000 Feb;86(1):25-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.86.1.25.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.2000.86.1.25
PMID:10778245
Abstract

A number of researchers have argued that ipsative data are not suitable for statistical procedures designed for normative data. Others have argued that the interpretability of such analyses of ipsative data are little affected where the number of variables and the sample size are sufficiently large. The research reported here represents a factor analysis of the scores on the Canfield Learning Styles Inventory for 1,252 students in vocational education. The results of the factor analysis of these ipsative data were examined in a context of existing theory and research on vocational students and lend support to the argument that the factor analysis of ipsative data can provide sensibly interpretable results.

摘要

相似文献

1
Vocational students' learning preferences: the interpretability of ipsative data.
Psychol Rep. 2000 Feb;86(1):25-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.86.1.25.
2
Changes in learning style preference during a three-year longitudinal study.一项为期三年的纵向研究中学习风格偏好的变化。
Psychol Rep. 1991 Dec;69(3 Pt 1):755-62. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.3.755.
3
Reliability of the Inventory of Learning Processes.学习过程量表的信度
Psychol Rep. 2003 Jun;92(3 Pt 1):1029-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.1029.
4
Testing the factor structure of the beliefs about language learning inventory.测试语言学习信念量表的因素结构。
Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Dec;111(3):707-21. doi: 10.2466/03.08.11.28.PMS.111.6.707-721.
5
An approach to studying scale for students in higher education: a Rasch measurement model analysis.一种针对高等教育学生的量表研究方法:拉施测量模型分析。
J Appl Meas. 2000;1(1):44-62.
6
The Novaco Anger Scale-Provocation Inventory (1994 version) in Dutch forensic psychiatric patients.荷兰法医精神病患者的 Novaco 愤怒量表-挑衅量表(1994 年版)。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):937-44. doi: 10.1037/a0024018. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
7
The relationship between the quality of cooperative learning, students' goal preferences, and perceptions of contextual factors in the classroom.合作学习质量、学生的目标偏好与课堂情境因素认知之间的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2006 Feb;47(1):9-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00488.x.
8
Thinking styles and cognitive development.思维方式与认知发展。
J Genet Psychol. 2002 Jun;163(2):179-95. doi: 10.1080/00221320209598676.
9
An assessment of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule from the perspective of the five-factor model.从五因素模型视角对爱德华个人偏好量表的评估
J Pers Assess. 1992 Feb;58(1):67-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5801_6.
10
Music preferences and personality among Japanese university students.日本大学生的音乐偏好与个性。
Int J Psychol. 2012;47(4):259-68. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.631544. Epub 2012 Jan 17.