• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合作学习质量、学生的目标偏好与课堂情境因素认知之间的关系。

The relationship between the quality of cooperative learning, students' goal preferences, and perceptions of contextual factors in the classroom.

作者信息

Hijzen Daphne, Boekaerts Monique, Vedder Paul

机构信息

Leiden University, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2006 Feb;47(1):9-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00488.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00488.x
PMID:16433658
Abstract

This study examined relationships between the quality of cooperative learning (CL) and students' goal preferences and perceptions of contextual factors in the classroom. Subjects were 1,920 students in secondary vocational schools. The study focused on four different types of goals: social support, belongingness, mastery, and superiority goals. It was found that social support goals had the strongest relation with the quality of CL. Further we found that the quality of CL was best predicted by a combination of social support goals, evaluations of the extent that students were taught cooperation skills, perception of teacher monitoring behavior, and the availability of academic and emotional peer support. Female students' preferences for mastery and social goals were stronger than those of male students, whereas male students had a stronger preference for superiority goals. Program type functioned as a moderator variable within the relation of students' superiority/ individuality goals and the quality of CL.

摘要

本研究考察了合作学习(CL)质量与学生的目标偏好以及对课堂情境因素的认知之间的关系。研究对象为1920名中等职业学校的学生。该研究聚焦于四种不同类型的目标:社会支持、归属感、掌握和优势目标。研究发现,社会支持目标与合作学习质量的关系最为紧密。此外,我们发现,合作学习质量最好由社会支持目标、对学生合作技能教学程度的评价、对教师监督行为的认知以及学业和情感同伴支持的可获得性共同预测。女生对掌握目标和社会目标的偏好强于男生,而男生对优势目标的偏好更强。课程类型在学生的优势/个性目标与合作学习质量的关系中起到调节变量的作用。

相似文献

1
The relationship between the quality of cooperative learning, students' goal preferences, and perceptions of contextual factors in the classroom.合作学习质量、学生的目标偏好与课堂情境因素认知之间的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2006 Feb;47(1):9-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00488.x.
2
Classroom climate and students' goal preferences: a cross-cultural comparison.课堂氛围与学生的目标偏好:一项跨文化比较
Scand J Psychol. 2009 Apr;50(2):143-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00691.x.
3
The role of achievement goal orientations in students' perceptions of and preferences for classroom environment.成就目标导向在学生对课堂环境的认知及偏好中的作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2008 Jun;78(Pt 2):291-312. doi: 10.1348/000709907X205272. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
4
Task- and self-related pathways to deep learning: the mediating role of achievement goals, classroom attentiveness, and group participation.深度学习中与任务和自我相关的途径:成就目标、课堂注意力和小组参与的中介作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2008 Dec;78(Pt 4):639-62. doi: 10.1348/000709907X270261. Epub 2007 Dec 29.
5
Future goal setting, task motivation and learning of minority and non-minority students in Dutch schools.荷兰学校中少数族裔和非少数族裔学生的未来目标设定、任务动机与学习
Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Dec;76(Pt 4):827-50. doi: 10.1348/000709906X148150.
6
University students' achievement goals and approaches to learning in mathematics.大学生在数学学习方面的成就目标和学习方法。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Mar;79(Pt 1):131-53. doi: 10.1348/000709908X314928. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
7
Self-managed learning groups in higher education: students' perceptions of process and outcomes.高等教育中的自主学习小组:学生对过程与结果的看法。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Sep;75(Pt 3):373-90. doi: 10.1348/000709905X25355.
8
Performance-approach and performance-avoidance classroom goals and the adoption of personal achievement goals.表现趋近目标和表现回避目标与个人成就目标的采纳。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2011 Dec;81(Pt 4):680-99. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02012.x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
9
Does priming for mastery goals improve the performance of students with an entity view of ability?为掌握目标进行启动是否能提高具有能力实体观的学生的表现?
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Sep;75(Pt 3):391-409. doi: 10.1348/000709904X22700.
10
Positive social interdependence and classroom climate.积极的社会相互依存与课堂氛围。
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1994 Aug;120(3):329-46.

引用本文的文献

1
University Student's Academic Goals When Working in Teams: Questionnaire on Academic Goals in Teamwork, 3 × 2 Model.大学生团队合作中的学术目标:团队合作中学术目标问卷,3×2模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 24;10:2434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02434. eCollection 2019.
2
Construction and Validation of a Measurement Instrument for Attitudes towards Teamwork.团队合作态度测量工具的构建与验证
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 20;8:1009. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01009. eCollection 2017.