La Batide-Alanore A, Chatellier G, Bobrie G, Fofol I, Plouin P F
Department of Hypertension, Broussais Hospital, Paris, France.
J Hypertens. 2000 Apr;18(4):391-8. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200018040-00006.
When measuring BP, the physician induces a transient pressor response triggered by an alarm reaction. This 'white-coat effect' can influence therapeutic decisions. Whether it depends on the characteristics of the physician has not been evaluated.
To assess the 'white-coat effect' induced by several physicians in a large sample of patients, using the blood pressure measured by trained nurses as a reference.
Referral hypertension clinic.
Patients were selected for the study if they had been referred for the first time to the clinic and if they had had their supine systolic/diastolic blood pressure measured by a trained nurse (mean of the last two of three measurements taken every 1 min by an oscillometric device) and a physician (auscultatory method using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer). Physicians were included in the study provided they had seen at least 25 patients during the study period. The between-physician difference was assessed using linear regression analysis. Physician blood pressure was the dependent and nurse blood pressure was the independent variable.
From 1 January 1997 to 15 September 1997, 1062 patients (50% male, aged 52 +/- 14 years), seen by 10 physicians (26-187 patients per physician) and one nurse were included for analysis. The mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure for physicians was 162 +/- 27/ 97 +/- 15 mmHg and that for the nurse was 155 +/- 24/ 88 +/- 14 mmHg. The nurse-physician differences were -6 mmHg (range -67 to +66) for systolic and -8 mmHg (-44 to +31) for diastolic blood pressures. Major differences were observed between individual physicians. Intercepts of the physician blood pressure versus nurse blood pressure relationship ranged from 0.1 -60.7 mmHg for systolic and from 13.3-55.3 mmHg for diastolic pressures. The slopes of this relationship differed less between physicians for systolic (0.72-1) than for diastolic pressures (0.56-0.97). There was no difference between the patients seen by physicians in patients' age, sex, tobacco consumption, anti-hypertensive treatment or target-organ damage.
Large between-physician differences exist in the magnitude of the white-coat effect that cannot be explained by patient characteristics. Physicians should therefore not make any decisions based on blood pressure measured manually during a first encounter.
测量血压时,医生会引发由警报反应触发的短暂升压反应。这种“白大衣效应”会影响治疗决策。其是否取决于医生的特征尚未得到评估。
以经过培训的护士测量的血压为参考,评估多位医生在大量患者中引发的“白大衣效应”。
高血压转诊诊所。
若患者首次被转诊至该诊所,且由经过培训的护士(使用示波装置每1分钟测量三次,取最后两次测量值的平均值)和医生(使用标准汞柱式血压计通过听诊法)测量过仰卧位收缩压/舒张压,则将其纳入研究。若医生在研究期间看过至少25名患者,则纳入研究。使用线性回归分析评估医生之间的差异。以医生测量的血压为因变量,护士测量的血压为自变量。
1997年1月1日至1997年9月15日,纳入1062例患者(50%为男性,年龄52±14岁)进行分析,这些患者由10位医生(每位医生看诊26 - 187例患者)和1名护士看过。医生测量的收缩压/舒张压平均值为162±27/97±15 mmHg,护士测量的为155±24/88±14 mmHg。收缩压的护士 - 医生差值为 -6 mmHg(范围 -67至 +66),舒张压为 -8 mmHg(-44至 +31)。各医生之间观察到显著差异。医生血压与护士血压关系的截距收缩压范围为0.1 - 60.7 mmHg,舒张压为13.3 - 55.3 mmHg。收缩压这种关系的斜率在医生之间的差异(0.72 - 1)小于舒张压(0.56 - 0.97)。医生看过的患者在年龄、性别、吸烟情况、抗高血压治疗或靶器官损害方面无差异。
医生之间“白大衣效应”的程度存在很大差异,且无法用患者特征来解释。因此,医生不应基于首次就诊时手动测量的血压做出任何决策。