Rayno K, Reichlin M
Arthritis and Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, USA.
Clin Immunol. 2000 May;95(2):99-103. doi: 10.1006/clim.2000.4852.
Sera from systemic lupus erythematosus patients that had antibodies to the ribosomal P proteins were compared in several different assays. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was compared to the Western immunoblotting method using either affinity purified human or bovine ribosomal P proteins. All 30 normal sera had no significant reactivity with these antigens. The most sensitive test was the ELISA using the human P protein, where 31/32 patients were positive (97%). The assay with bovine proteins in ELISA yielded 28/32 (88%) positive results. Immunoblotting with either bovine or human P protein was equally effective with 30/32 (94%) positive. An ELISA incorporating human P proteins is a more sensitive assay for clinical diagnosis than an ELISA with the bovine protein. Immunoblotting is a sensitive method, but is less convenient and is not quantitative. The ELISA with the human protein appears to be the method of choice.
对患有核糖体P蛋白抗体的系统性红斑狼疮患者的血清进行了几种不同检测方法的比较。使用亲和纯化的人或牛核糖体P蛋白,将酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法与Western免疫印迹法进行了比较。所有30份正常血清与这些抗原均无明显反应性。最敏感的检测方法是使用人P蛋白的ELISA,其中32例患者中有31例呈阳性(97%)。ELISA中使用牛蛋白的检测产生了28/32(88%)的阳性结果。用牛或人P蛋白进行免疫印迹同样有效,阳性率为30/32(94%)。与使用牛蛋白的ELISA相比,包含人P蛋白的ELISA对临床诊断是一种更敏感的检测方法。免疫印迹是一种敏感的方法,但不太方便且不具有定量性。使用人蛋白的ELISA似乎是首选方法。