文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

慢性阻塞性气道疾病中氢氟烷烃和氯氟烃定量吸入器给药安全性的比较。

Comparison of the safety of drug delivery via HFA- and CFC-metered dose inhalers in CAO.

作者信息

Huchon G, Hofbauer P, Cannizzaro G, Iacono P, Wald F

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de l'Hotel-Dieu, Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2000 Apr;15(4):663-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15d07.x.


DOI:10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15d07.x
PMID:10780756
Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the long-term safety of a fixed combination of fenoterol hydrobromide (50 microg) and ipratropium bromide (20 microg) delivered using a metered dose inhaler (MDI) formulated with a non-chlorinated propellant, hydrofluoroalkanel34a (HFA-MDI), with delivery using the conventional chlorofluorocarbon propellant (CFC-MDI, Berodual/Bronchodual). The study was designed according to Safety Assessment of Marketed Medicines (SAMM) guidelines, to reflect as far as possible the use of MDls under normal prescribing conditions. Two thousand and twenty-seven patients with chronic airways obstruction (CAO) were enrolled from 99 centres in France, 95 centres in Germany and 24 centres in Italy. Following a 2-week run-in period, patients were randomized on a 2:1 basis (1,348 patients to HFA-MDI, 679 patients to CFC-MDI) to receive a flexible dose regimen of the combination (2 puffs, 2-4 times a day, as prescribed by the investigator) during a 12-week open label phase. The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between both groups. In addition, the incidence of respiratory side effects was also similar, with CAO exacerbations or bronchitis the most frequently recorded events. The safety profile of the HFA formulation was comparable to those of the marketed CFC-MDIs used in Germany and France/Italy. No clinically significant differences were detected between HFA134a or CFC driven inhalers on the switch from CFC- to HFA-MDI (2 weeks before randomisation versus 2 weeks after randomization). There was a trend for taste complaints to be reported more frequently by patients in the HFA-MDI group (0.7% before randomization versus 3.4% after randomization). This, however, was an expected finding as the HFA134a formulation does have a different taste to the CFC formulation. No difference between formulations was observed in the incidences of coughing or paradoxical bronchospasm. The incidence of falls in FEV1 >15% within 15 min following inhalation at each of the clinic visits was 1.2% for both CFC- and HFA-MDIs. In conclusion, administration of a fenoterol/ipratropium bromide combination via hydrofluoroalkane-metered dose inhaler is as safe as delivery by the currently available chlorofluorocarbon-metered dose inhaler, in an extended population of patients with CAO under normal prescribing conditions.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较使用含非氯化推进剂氢氟烷烃134a(HFA-MDI)的定量吸入器(MDI)递送的氢溴酸非诺特罗(50微克)和异丙托溴铵(20微克)固定组合,与使用传统氯氟烃推进剂(CFC-MDI,贝罗杜尔/支气管杜尔)递送的长期安全性。该研究是根据上市药品安全性评估(SAMM)指南设计的,以尽可能反映在正常处方条件下MDI的使用情况。从法国的99个中心、德国的95个中心和意大利的24个中心招募了2027例慢性气道阻塞(CAO)患者。在为期2周的导入期后,患者按2:1的比例随机分组(1348例患者使用HFA-MDI,679例患者使用CFC-MDI),在为期12周的开放标签阶段接受灵活剂量方案的联合用药(2喷,每天2 - 4次,由研究者规定)。两组不良事件的总发生率相当。此外,呼吸道副作用的发生率也相似,CAO加重或支气管炎是最常记录的事件。HFA制剂的安全性与德国和法国/意大利使用的上市CFC-MDI相当。在从CFC-MDI转换为HFA-MDI时(随机分组前2周与随机分组后2周),未检测到HFA134a或CFC驱动的吸入器之间有临床显著差异。HFA-MDI组患者报告味觉不适的趋势更频繁(随机分组前为0.7%,随机分组后为3.4%)。然而,这是一个预期发现,因为HFA134a制剂的味道与CFC制剂不同。在咳嗽或矛盾性支气管痉挛的发生率方面,未观察到制剂之间的差异。在每次门诊就诊时吸入后15分钟内FEV1下降>15%的发生率,CFC-MDI和HFA-MDI均为1.2%。总之,在正常处方条件下,在患有CAO的扩大患者群体中,通过氢氟烷烃定量吸入器给予非诺特罗/异丙托溴铵组合与目前可用的氯氟烃定量吸入器给药一样安全。

相似文献

[1]
Comparison of the safety of drug delivery via HFA- and CFC-metered dose inhalers in CAO.

Eur Respir J. 2000-4

[2]
Fenoterol hydrobromide delivered via HFA-MDI or CFC-MDI in patients with asthma: a safety and efficacy comparison.

Respir Med. 2000-10

[3]
Therapeutic equivalence of a novel HFA134a-containing metered-dose inhaler and the conventional CFC inhaler (Berodual) for the delivery of a fixed combination of fenoterol/ipratropium bromide. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study in patients with asthma.

Respiration. 1997

[4]
Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide plus fenoterol inhaled via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler vs. a conventional metered dose inhaler plus spacer in children with asthma.

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004-3

[5]
Preliminary data from phase II studies with Respimat, a propellant-free soft mist inhaler.

J Aerosol Med. 1999

[6]
Improved delivery of ipratropium bromide/fenoterol from Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler in patients with COPD.

Respir Med. 2004-5

[7]
Ipratropium bromide HFA.

Treat Respir Med. 2005

[8]
Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/salbutamol sulphate administered in a hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler for the treatment of COPD.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016-6-30

[9]
A review of ipratropium bromide/fenoterol hydrobromide (Berodual) delivered via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Drugs. 2004

[10]
Respimat (a new soft mist inhaler) delivering fenoterol plus ipratropium bromide provides equivalent bronchodilation at half the cumulative dose compared with a conventional metered dose inhaler in asthmatic patients.

Respiration. 2000

引用本文的文献

[1]
Polylactide, Processed by a Foaming Method Using Compressed Freon R134a, for Tissue Engineering.

Polymers (Basel). 2021-10-9

[2]
Anaesthetic in the garb of a propellant.

Indian J Anaesth. 2015-4

[3]
One-Year Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Ipratropium Bromide HFA and CFC Inhalation Aerosols in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Clin Drug Investig. 2003

[4]
Lack of paradoxical bronchoconstriction after administration of tiotropium via Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler in COPD.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011-4-26

[5]
Severity staging of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: differences in pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry.

Yonsei Med J. 2009-10-21

[6]
Pressurised metered dose inhalers versus all other hand-held inhaler devices to deliver beta-2 agonist bronchodilators for non-acute asthma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索