Bomba J
Katedry Psychiatrii CM UJ.
Psychiatr Pol. 1999 Mar-Apr;33(2):179-88.
History of undergraduate training in psychiatry at medical schools in Poland was briefly reviewed showing a traditional independence of chairpersons of psychiatry in forming programmes and deciding about forms of education. Since 1990 this independence has been controlled by the faculties and, to some extent only, regulated by the national curriculum in medicine. Goals, contents and forms of undergraduate training in psychiatry were examined (following Bilikiewicz's study in 1994) with the author's own questionnaire. Professors of psychiatry, respondents to the questionnaire were of very similar opinions in regard to the goals of training. At the same time, meaningful differences were found in the methods used, position of the subject in the curriculum and even time designed for psychiatry training (at some schools below the national minimum). There were also significant differences in the contents of the programme. The most important problem seems to be absence of child and adolescent psychiatry at some schools. Integration of psychiatry with other pre-clinical and clinical subjects was assessed too. The information received suggests that Polish professors of psychiatry approved of the way their subject had been integrated with others. This seems to be overestimation, especially if compared with the Kraków experience presented in a more detailed way.
对波兰医学院校本科精神病学培训的历史进行了简要回顾,结果显示,精神病学系主任在制定课程计划和决定教育形式方面传统上具有独立性。自1990年以来,这种独立性受到各学院的控制,并且在一定程度上仅受国家医学课程的规范。采用作者自己设计的问卷(参照比利凯维奇1994年的研究)对本科精神病学培训的目标、内容和形式进行了调查。参与问卷调查的精神病学教授们在培训目标方面意见非常相似。与此同时,在教学方法、该学科在课程中的地位,甚至精神病学培训的时长(某些学校低于国家最低标准)方面发现了显著差异。课程内容也存在显著差异。最重要的问题似乎是一些学校没有儿童和青少年精神病学课程。还评估了精神病学与其他基础临床和临床学科的整合情况。所获得的信息表明,波兰的精神病学教授们认可他们的学科与其他学科的整合方式。这似乎有些高估,特别是与更详细介绍的克拉科夫的经验相比。