Al Nazer M, Mourad W A
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2000 Apr;22(4):223-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0339(200004)22:4<223::aid-dc4>3.0.co;2-b.
Early-stage renal-cell carcinoma is more frequently diagnosed due to more frequent use of advanced radiologic techniques. Partial nephrectomy may be curative for small tumors and may sometimes be necessary if the opposite kidney is functionally compromised. This therapeutic option is however not possible in high-grade neoplasms. In the current study, we attempted to grade cases of renal-cell carcinoma on smears obtained from preoperative fine-needle aspirates (FNA). Eighteen cases of histologically proven renal-cell carcinoma formed the basis of this study. FNAs were performed prior to nephrectomy. FNA smears were blindly reviewed, and the cases were evaluated for cellularity, nuclear to cytoplasmic (N/C) ratios, nuclear pleomorphism, and the presence of naked nuclei and prominent nucleoli; cases were graded according to the presence or absence of these criteria and their combination. The cases were cytologically graded from grade I-IV and then were given a low grade if the tumor was considered grade I or II, or high grade if the tumor was considered grade III or IV. The histology of the neoplasms was reviewed, and the tumors were graded according to the Fuhrman nuclear grading system. Correlation between the cytologic and histologic grades within the same histologic grade was seen in 13 of the 18 cases (72.2%). The difference was no more than one grade for each discrepancy. When grading as high or low grade was used, agreement was seen in 100% of the cases. The most reliable cytologic features seen on cytology distinguishing low- from high-grade tumors were the N/C ratio and the presence or absence of nucleoli. Pleomorphism, naked nuclei, and increased cellularity were less distinguishing features. We conclude that grading of renal-cell carcinoma can be reliably achieved in FNA material. Preoperative FNAs can thus be performed on small renal neoplasms with subsequent conservative treatment if the tumor proves to be low grade.
由于先进放射技术的使用更加频繁,早期肾细胞癌的诊断也更为常见。对于小肿瘤,部分肾切除术可能具有治愈性,并且如果对侧肾功能受损,有时也有必要进行该手术。然而,这种治疗方法不适用于高级别肿瘤。在本研究中,我们尝试对术前细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)涂片上的肾细胞癌病例进行分级。18例经组织学证实的肾细胞癌病例构成了本研究的基础。FNA在肾切除术之前进行。对FNA涂片进行盲法评估,并根据细胞数量、核质比(N/C)、核多形性以及裸核和显著核仁的存在情况对病例进行评估;根据这些标准的存在与否及其组合对病例进行分级。病例在细胞学上分为I-IV级,如果肿瘤被认为是I级或II级,则给予低级别,如果肿瘤被认为是III级或IV级,则给予高级别。对肿瘤的组织学进行复查,并根据Fuhrman核分级系统对肿瘤进行分级。18例病例中有13例(72.2%)在相同组织学分级内的细胞学和组织学分级之间存在相关性。每次差异不超过一个级别。当使用高或低级别进行分级时,100%的病例意见一致。在细胞学上区分低级别和高级别肿瘤最可靠的特征是N/C比以及核仁的存在与否。多形性、裸核和细胞数量增加是区分性较差的特征。我们得出结论,在FNA材料中可以可靠地实现肾细胞癌的分级。因此,如果肿瘤被证明是低级别,对于小的肾肿瘤可以在术前进行FNA,随后进行保守治疗。