Anttila V, Pokela M, Kiviluoma K, Mäkiranta M, Hirvonen J, Juvonen T
Departments of Surgery and Anaesthesiology and the Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 May;119(5):1021-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70098-5.
Previous studies have shown that retrograde cerebral perfusion can improve neurologic outcome after prolonged hypothermic circulatory arrest. Here we have compared two temperatures of retrograde cerebral perfusion (15 degrees C and 25 degrees C) with hypothermic circulatory arrest at systemic hypothermia of 25 degrees C to clarify whether the possible benefit of retrograde cerebral perfusion may only be due to improved cooling effect.
Eighteen pigs (23-27 kg) were randomly assigned to undergo 15 degrees C retrograde cerebral perfusion at systemic hypothermia of 25 degrees C, 25 degrees C retrograde cerebral perfusion at 25 degrees C systemic hypothermia, or hypothermic circulatory arrest at 25 degrees C for 40 minutes. Flow was adjusted to maintain superior vena cava pressure at 20 mm Hg during retrograde cerebral perfusion. Hemodynamic, electrophysiologic, metabolic, and temperature monitoring were performed until 4 hours after the start of rewarming. Daily behavioral assessment was done until death or until the animals were killed on day 7. Histopathologic analysis of the brain was carried out on all animals.
Epidural temperatures were lower in the 15 degrees C retrograde cerebral perfusion group during the intervention (P <.05). In the 15 degrees C retrograde cerebral perfusion group, 4 (67%) of 6 animals survived for 7 days compared with 3 (50%) of 6 in both the 25 degrees C retrograde cerebral perfusion and hypothermic circulatory arrest groups. The median total histopathologic score was 5 in the 15 degrees C retrograde cerebral perfusion group and 7 in the 25 degrees C retrograde cerebral perfusion group (P =.04).
These findings suggest that enhanced cranial hypothermia is the major beneficial factor of retrograde cerebral perfusion when careful attention is paid to its implementation.
先前的研究表明,逆行脑灌注可改善长时间低温循环停止后的神经功能预后。在此,我们将两种逆行脑灌注温度(15摄氏度和25摄氏度)与25摄氏度全身低温下的低温循环停止进行了比较,以阐明逆行脑灌注可能的益处是否仅归因于改善的降温效果。
18头猪(23 - 27千克)被随机分配接受25摄氏度全身低温下的15摄氏度逆行脑灌注、25摄氏度全身低温下的25摄氏度逆行脑灌注或25摄氏度下的低温循环停止40分钟。在逆行脑灌注期间,调整流量以维持上腔静脉压力在20毫米汞柱。进行血流动力学、电生理、代谢和温度监测,直至复温开始后4小时。每日进行行为评估,直至死亡或直至动物在第7天被处死。对所有动物的大脑进行组织病理学分析。
在干预期间,15摄氏度逆行脑灌注组的硬膜外温度较低(P <.05)。在15摄氏度逆行脑灌注组中,6只动物中有4只(67%)存活了7天,而25摄氏度逆行脑灌注组和低温循环停止组的6只动物中均有3只(50%)存活。15摄氏度逆行脑灌注组的组织病理学总评分中位数为5,25摄氏度逆行脑灌注组为7(P =.04)。
这些发现表明,当仔细关注其实施时,增强的颅脑低温是逆行脑灌注的主要有益因素。