• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微型腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛。一项随机双盲对照研究。

Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blind controlled study.

作者信息

Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J

机构信息

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology 435, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2000 Apr;14(4):340-4. doi: 10.1007/s004640020014.

DOI:10.1007/s004640020014
PMID:10790551
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is traditionally performed with two 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars. The effect of smaller port incisions on pain has not been established in controlled studies.

METHODS

In a double-blind controlled study, patients were randomized to LC or cholecystectomy with three 2-mm trocars and one 10-mm trocar (micro-LC). All patients received a multimodal analgesic regimen, including incisional local anesthetics at the beginning of surgery, NSAID, and paracetamol. Pain was registered preoperatively, for the first 3 h postoperatively, and daily for the 1st week.

RESULTS

The study was discontinued after inclusion of 26 patients because five of the 13 patients (38%) randomized to micro-LC were converted to LC. In the remaining 21 patients, overall pain and incisional pain intensity during the first 3 h postoperatively increased in the LC group (n = 13) compared with preoperative pain levels (p<0.01), whereas pain did not increase in the micro-LC group (n = 8).

CONCLUSIONS

Micro-LC in combination with a prophylactic multimodal analgesic regimen reduced postoperative pain for the first 3 h postoperatively. However, the micro-LC led to an unacceptable rate of conversion to LC (38%). The micro-LC instruments therefore need further technical development before this surgical technique can be used on a routine basis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

摘要

背景

传统的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)需使用两个10毫米和两个5毫米的套管针。在对照研究中,较小的切口对疼痛的影响尚未明确。

方法

在一项双盲对照研究中,患者被随机分为接受LC手术组或使用三个2毫米套管针和一个10毫米套管针的胆囊切除术组(微型LC)。所有患者均接受多模式镇痛方案,包括手术开始时的切口局部麻醉、非甾体抗炎药和对乙酰氨基酚。术前、术后前3小时以及术后第1周每天记录疼痛情况。

结果

纳入26例患者后该研究终止,因为随机分配至微型LC组的13例患者中有5例(38%)转为接受LC手术。在其余21例患者中,与术前疼痛水平相比,LC组(n = 13)术后前3小时的总体疼痛和切口疼痛强度增加(p<0.01),而微型LC组(n = 8)疼痛未增加。

结论

微型LC联合预防性多模式镇痛方案可减轻术后前3小时的疼痛。然而,微型LC导致转为接受LC手术的比例高达38%,令人难以接受。因此,在该手术技术能够常规用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术之前,微型LC器械需要进一步的技术改进。

相似文献

1
Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blind controlled study.微型腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛。一项随机双盲对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2000 Apr;14(4):340-4. doi: 10.1007/s004640020014.
2
Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial.微型腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性随机双盲试验
Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):458-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9026-5. Epub 2001 Nov 16.
3
Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing standard analgesia with combined intra-operative cystic plate and port-site local anesthesia for post-operative pain management in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.前瞻性随机对照试验:比较标准镇痛与术中联合胆囊板及切口局部麻醉用于择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛管理的效果
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):704-713. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5024-5. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
4
Prospective randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain, and cosmetic results after laparoscopic vs. microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜与微腹腔镜胆囊切除术后肺功能、疼痛及美容效果的前瞻性随机双盲试验
Surg Endosc. 2000 Apr;14(4):345-8. doi: 10.1007/s004640020063.
5
Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.接受预防性多模式镇痛的患者在腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间进行多区域局部麻醉药浸润:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):1017-24. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00036.
6
Interim report: a randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.中期报告:一项比较单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的随机对照试验。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 Feb;6(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2012.00154.x. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
7
Preoperative dexamethasone improves surgical outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.术前使用地塞米松可改善腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的手术效果:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2003 Nov;238(5):651-60. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094390.82352.cb.
8
Analgesic Effect Of Bilateral Subcostal Tap Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后双侧肋下神经阻滞的镇痛效果
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018 Jan-Mar;30(1):12-15.
9
Effectiveness of Local Anesthetics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.局部麻醉药在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的有效性:一项随机临床试验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Aug;25(4):317-20. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000166.
10
[Analgesic efficacy of the incisional infiltration of ropivacaine vs ropivacaine with dexamethasone in the elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy].罗哌卡因与罗哌卡因联合地塞米松切口浸润在择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的镇痛效果
Cir Cir. 2013 Sep-Oct;81(5):383-93.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3.
2
Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的循证外科
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Aug 18;10:116-134. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.08.003. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
A SAGES technology and value assessment and pediatric committee evaluation of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation.
SAGES 技术和价值评估以及小儿微创器械委员会评估。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7077-7091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09467-5. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
4
Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature.迷你腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术和阑尾切除术对比:是否值得?病例系列及文献综述
J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Apr 4;2022(4):rjac136. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac136. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Feasibility and Safety of Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性及安全性比较
Cureus. 2021 Nov 29;13(11):e19979. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19979. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the MiniLap percutaneous surgical system: a series of 32 patients.使用MiniLap经皮手术系统进行的迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术:32例患者的系列研究
Int J Gen Med. 2018 Sep 20;11:369-371. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S172655. eCollection 2018.
7
Hybrid Transvaginal NOTES and Mini-Laparoscopic Colectomy: Benefit Through Synergy.经阴道NOTES与微型腹腔镜联合结肠切除术:协同增效带来益处
JSLS. 2016 Oct-Dec;20(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00062.
8
Micro-laparoscopic colectomy: initial experience.微型腹腔镜结肠切除术:初步经验
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Feb;19(2):344-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2689-8. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
9
The efficacy and safety of different kinds of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a network meta analysis of 43 randomized controlled trials.不同类型腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效与安全性:43项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090313. eCollection 2014.
10
Miniports versus standard ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的微型端口与标准端口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 1;2013(8):CD006804. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006804.pub3.