• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微型腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性随机双盲试验

Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial.

作者信息

Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J

机构信息

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology 435, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):458-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9026-5. Epub 2001 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-001-9026-5
PMID:11928028
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Downsizing the port incisions may reduce pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

In a double-blind controlled study, 60 patients were randomized to undergo either microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy using one 10-mm and three 3.5-mm trocars (3.5-mm LC) or traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy using two 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars (LC). Incisional pain at each port incision and overall pain were recorded for 1 week after the operation. Fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pulmonary function, and cosmetic results were also measured.

RESULTS

Data from 52 patients were analyzed; eight patients were excluded from the study for various reasons. One patient was converted from 3.5-mm LC to LC due to technical problems with the 3.5-mm optic. In the 3.5-mm LC group (n = 25), incisional pain was significantly decreased in the 1st postoperative week as compared with the LC group (n = 27) (p <0.01). In both groups, pain scores at the supraumbilical 10-mm port were significantly higher compared with other port sites (p <0.05). The cosmetic results were significantly better in the 3.5-mm LC group (p <0.01). There were no significant differences in any of the other variables.

CONCLUSION

The use of 3.5-mm trocars is feasible in LC, and it both reduces incisional pain and improves the cosmetic result.

摘要

背景

缩小切口可能会减轻腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的疼痛。

方法

在一项双盲对照研究中,60例患者被随机分为两组,分别接受使用一个10毫米和三个3.5毫米套管针的微腹腔镜胆囊切除术(3.5毫米LC组)或使用两个10毫米和两个5毫米套管针的传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC组)。术后记录每个切口处的疼痛以及整体疼痛情况,持续1周。同时还测量了疲劳、恶心呕吐、肺功能和美容效果。

结果

分析了52例患者的数据;8例患者因各种原因被排除在研究之外。1例患者因3.5毫米腹腔镜的技术问题从3.5毫米LC组转为LC组。在3.5毫米LC组(n = 25)中,术后第1周的切口疼痛与LC组(n = 27)相比显著降低(p <0.01)。在两组中,脐上10毫米切口处的疼痛评分均显著高于其他切口部位(p <0.05)。3.5毫米LC组的美容效果显著更好(p <0.01)。其他变量在两组之间均无显著差异。

结论

在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用3.5毫米套管针是可行的,它既能减轻切口疼痛,又能改善美容效果。

相似文献

1
Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial.微型腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性随机双盲试验
Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):458-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9026-5. Epub 2001 Nov 16.
2
Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.迷你腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的优势:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果
Arch Surg. 2005 Dec;140(12):1178-83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.12.1178.
3
Efficacy of preoperative dexamethasone in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study.术前地塞米松对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的疗效:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(3):367-71. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0079-5. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
4
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments.使用微型器械进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2003 Nov;90(11):1345-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4315.
5
Post-operative pain in needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial.针状腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的术后疼痛:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001 Jun;46(3):138-42.
6
Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.迷你腹腔镜与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项对比研究。
Arch Surg. 2003 Sep;138(9):1017-23. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.9.1017.
7
A randomized, prospective, blinded comparison of postoperative pain, metabolic response, and perceived health after laparoscopic and small incision cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口胆囊切除术后疼痛、代谢反应及健康感知的随机、前瞻性、盲法比较
Surgery. 1998 May;123(5):485-95. doi: 10.1067/msy.1998.87552.
8
Randomized clinical trial of the effect of preoperative dexamethasone on nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.术前地塞米松对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后恶心呕吐影响的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2006 Mar;93(3):295-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5252.
9
Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术对比
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jun;15(6):614-8. doi: 10.1007/s004640000316. Epub 2000 Mar 13.
10
Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blind controlled study.微型腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛。一项随机双盲对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2000 Apr;14(4):340-4. doi: 10.1007/s004640020014.

引用本文的文献

1
Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study with Legal Considerations.迷你腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:来自一项单中心回顾性队列研究的见解及法律考量
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 3;61(7):1216. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071216.
2
Risk Factors for Difficult Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术困难的危险因素
Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71680. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71680. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.
单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3.
4
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的系统评价和Meta分析
Cureus. 2022 Dec 14;14(12):e32524. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32524. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
A SAGES technology and value assessment and pediatric committee evaluation of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation.SAGES 技术和价值评估以及小儿微创器械委员会评估。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7077-7091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09467-5. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
6
Minilaparoscopic over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy: is it worth it? A case series and review of literature.迷你腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术和阑尾切除术对比:是否值得?病例系列及文献综述
J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Apr 4;2022(4):rjac136. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac136. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with two incisions: an improved, feasible and safe technique with superior cosmetic outcomes.两切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种改良的、可行的、安全的技术,具有更好的美容效果。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Dec;48(12):300060520980589. doi: 10.1177/0300060520980589.
8
Safety and feasibility of prolonged versus early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a single-center retrospective study.急性胆囊炎行延期与早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性及可行性:一项单中心回顾性研究
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2297-2305. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07643-z. Epub 2020 May 22.
9
Twenty years of mini-laparoscopy in Brazil: What we have learned so far.巴西二十年的迷你腹腔镜检查:我们目前所学到的知识。
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):271-273. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_179_19.
10
Mini-Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses.迷你腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性附件肿块的比较
J Clin Med Res. 2017 Jul;9(7):613-617. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3060w. Epub 2017 May 22.