Armentrout PB
Chemistry Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112, USA.
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2000 May;11(5):371-9. doi: 10.1016/s1044-0305(00)00102-1.
In the literature, data obtained using the kinetic method have been analyzed to provide both ion affinities and relative entropies for the competitive dissociations involved. In this work, the procedure used to extract this information is shown to be statistically flawed. Using more rigorous statistical procedures, we outline alternative methods of acquiring the same information, including straightforward means of analyzing the uncertainties in the thermodynamic quantities obtained. Fortunately, it is expected that the central values reported in previous work need not be changed, but the uncertainties are much larger than has been previously detailed. The validity of the assumptions involved in the extraction of entropy effects is discussed in some detail.
在文献中,已对使用动力学方法获得的数据进行分析,以提供所涉及竞争性解离的离子亲和力和相对熵。在这项工作中,用于提取此信息的程序被证明存在统计缺陷。使用更严格的统计程序,我们概述了获取相同信息的替代方法,包括分析所获得的热力学量不确定性的直接方法。幸运的是,预计先前工作中报告的中心值无需更改,但不确定性比先前详细说明的要大得多。我们还详细讨论了提取熵效应所涉及假设的有效性。