Górska B, Frankowska K
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 1978;26(1-6):1101-3.
In 47 serum samples obtained from 31 women immunized with D antigen of the Rh system the level of anti-Rh D antibodies was measured by the papain and antiglobulin tests and the IgG subclasses of anti-Rh antibodies were determined. If the antibodies were of the IgG1 subclass or if this subclass prevailed in the IgG subclass pattern, the antibody level determined by the papain test of Löw was higher or equal to their level found in the antiglobulin test. In all cases, in which the antibodies titer was higher in the antiglobulin test, the antibodies were either of the IgG3 subclass exclusively, or this subclass prevailed quantitatively. This was due to partial inactivation of antibodies belonging to the IgG3 subclass by papain added to the serum in the Löw's test. In the test with papainized erythrocytes (called two-stage test) the IgG subclasses could not be differentiated, and the results obtained then were always higher than in the antiglobulin test. The differences in the reactions of antibodies performed routinely for diagnostic purposes can be explained by differences in immunoglobulin subclasses produced during immunization.
在从31名接种Rh系统D抗原的女性身上获取的47份血清样本中,通过木瓜蛋白酶试验和抗球蛋白试验测定了抗Rh D抗体的水平,并确定了抗Rh抗体的IgG亚类。如果抗体属于IgG1亚类,或者在IgG亚类模式中该亚类占主导,那么通过Löw木瓜蛋白酶试验测定的抗体水平高于或等于在抗球蛋白试验中发现的水平。在所有抗球蛋白试验中抗体滴度更高的情况下,抗体要么仅属于IgG3亚类,要么该亚类在数量上占主导。这是因为在Löw试验中添加到血清中的木瓜蛋白酶使属于IgG3亚类的抗体部分失活。在用木瓜蛋白酶处理过的红细胞进行的试验(称为两步试验)中,无法区分IgG亚类,且当时获得的结果总是高于抗球蛋白试验的结果。用于诊断目的的常规抗体反应差异可通过免疫接种期间产生的免疫球蛋白亚类差异来解释。