Popovic N, Gillet P, Rodriguez A, Lemaire R
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery-Traumatology, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium.
J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Mar-Apr;14(3):171-7. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200003000-00004.
To assess elbow function, complications, and problems of radial head fractures associated with elbow dislocation receiving surgical treatment with a floating prosthesis.
Prospective clinical study.
University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium.
Eleven consecutive adult patients were treated with a floating prosthesis for acute radial head fractures associated with elbow dislocation from January 1994 to September 1996.
The floating radial head prosthesis (Tornier SA, Saint-Ismier, France) was used in all our patients. The implant is in two parts: a radial head made of high-density polyethylene enclosed in a cobalt-chrome cup, which articulates in a semiconstrained manner with the spherical end of a cemented intramedullary stem. The implants were inserted within the first week following the injury (range 2 to 7 days). Three cases also required internal fixation of the coronoid process of the ulna; in one case plate fixation of an olecranon fracture was also performed.
Patients were assessed by physical examination, a functional rating index (Morrey et al.), and radiographs. The parameters evaluated were motion, stability, pain, and grip strength. Potential complications such as infection, prosthetic failure, or dislocation were investigated.
The minimum follow-up time was two years (mean 32 months, range 24 to 56 months). Four patients were considered to have excellent results, four patients were considered to have good results, two patients had fair results, and one patient had a poor result. There were no cases of infection, prosthetic failure, or dislocation. No patient required prosthetic revision.
The basic principle of maintaining anatomic and physiologic relationships applies when deciding on treatment for radial head fractures with associated elbow dislocation. The loss of lateral osseous support will render the elbow grossly unstable. We believe that a floating prosthesis may be indicated in Mason Type III radial head fractures associated with elbow dislocation, especially in the presence of associated destabilizing fractures. Well-controlled comparative randomized studies will be needed to delineate the optimal treatment for a given situation.
评估采用浮动假体手术治疗的伴有肘关节脱位的桡骨头骨折的肘关节功能、并发症及相关问题。
前瞻性临床研究。
比利时列日市 Sart Tilman 大学医院骨科。
1994年1月至1996年9月,连续11例成年患者因急性桡骨头骨折伴肘关节脱位接受浮动假体治疗。
所有患者均使用浮动桡骨头假体(法国圣伊米耶的 Tornier SA公司生产)。该植入物分为两部分:一个由高密度聚乙烯制成的桡骨头,包裹在一个钴铬合金杯内,它与一个骨水泥固定的髓内柄的球形末端以半约束方式进行关节活动。植入物在受伤后的第一周内插入(范围为2至7天)。3例患者还需要对尺骨冠状突进行内固定;1例患者还对鹰嘴骨折进行了钢板固定。
通过体格检查、功能评分指数(Morrey等人)和X线片对患者进行评估。评估的参数包括活动度、稳定性、疼痛和握力。调查潜在的并发症,如感染、假体失败或脱位。
最短随访时间为两年(平均32个月,范围为24至56个月)。4例患者结果为优,4例患者结果为良,2例患者结果为中,1例患者结果为差。无感染、假体失败或脱位病例。无患者需要进行假体翻修。
在决定治疗伴有肘关节脱位的桡骨头骨折时,维持解剖和生理关系的基本原则适用。外侧骨支撑的丧失会使肘关节严重不稳定。我们认为,浮动假体可能适用于伴有肘关节脱位的梅森III型桡骨头骨折,尤其是在存在相关不稳定骨折的情况下。需要进行严格对照的比较随机研究来确定针对特定情况的最佳治疗方法。