Frank R P, Brudvik J S, Leroux B, Milgrom P, Hawkins N
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash, 98195-7452, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 May;83(5):521-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70008-4.
Little is known about the importance of published fabrication standards in determining the outcome of treatment with mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures in patients of community practices.
This study describes mandibular partial dentures worn by patients from King County, Wash., and examines the validity of standards of design and fabrication by relating the standards to measures of clinical acceptability and patient satisfaction.
Eighty-two people treated in private dental practices who responded to a mail survey about satisfaction with a partial denture were examined. Eight standards of fabrication, overall clinical acceptability of the prosthesis, and tissue health were evaluated clinically. Patient satisfaction was assessed by questionnaire. Associations between variables were assessed by contingency tables and odds ratios.
Half the prostheses met 4 or fewer of the 8 standards, and these were responsible for nearly all the displacement of tissue by the framework. Forty-three percent of the dentures (35/82) were rated clinically acceptable. Of the remaining dentures, 38 could be made acceptable by modifications. The remaining 9 dentures needed replacement. Sixty-three percent of the patients examined were satisfied with the dentures. There was a relationship between tissue health and the fabrication standards related to rest form, base extension, stress distribution, and framework fit. This study found no relation between tissue health and other design or fabrication features. None of the standards were found to be related to patient satisfaction.
This study found partial support for the validity of design/fabrication standards for removable partial dentures. The most important standards are rest form, base extension, and stress distribution. The standards appear to be unrelated to patient satisfaction.
在社区诊所患者中,关于已发表的制作标准在确定下颌远中游离端可摘局部义齿治疗效果方面的重要性,人们了解甚少。
本研究描述了华盛顿州金县患者佩戴的下颌局部义齿,并通过将标准与临床可接受性和患者满意度的测量指标相关联,检验设计和制作标准的有效性。
对82名在私人牙科诊所接受治疗并回复了关于局部义齿满意度邮件调查的患者进行了检查。临床上评估了八项制作标准、义齿的总体临床可接受性和组织健康状况。通过问卷调查评估患者满意度。通过列联表和比值比评估变量之间的关联。
一半的义齿符合八项标准中的四项或更少,这些义齿几乎导致了基托对组织的所有移位。43%的义齿(35/82)在临床上被评为可接受。在其余的义齿中,38例经修改后可变为可接受。其余9例义齿需要更换。63%接受检查的患者对义齿满意。组织健康与与支托形态、基托伸展、应力分布和基托贴合相关的制作标准之间存在关联。本研究未发现组织健康与其他设计或制作特征之间存在关联。未发现任何标准与患者满意度相关。
本研究发现可摘局部义齿设计/制作标准的有效性得到部分支持。最重要的标准是支托形态、基托伸展和应力分布。这些标准似乎与患者满意度无关。