• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单颗牙种植修复模型精度的体外比较

In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement.

作者信息

Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G

机构信息

University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2000 May;83(5):562-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70015-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70015-1
PMID:10793389
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The inaccuracy in transferring the position of the hexagonal head of a single implant to the working cast can result in a final single tooth crown, which clinically may present occlusal and/or interproximal contacts that are different from those contacts on the master cast obtained by the technician.

PURPOSE

This in vitro study evaluated the accuracy of the master casts obtained using square pick-up impression copings for single-tooth replacement. Copings used were (1) copings as sold by the manufacturer, and (2) copings modified by sandblasting and coating with impression adhesive their roughened surfaces before final impression procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A polymeric resin model with a standard single implant was used to simulate a clinical situation. A group of 20 impressions were made using nonmodified impression copings; a second group of 20 impressions were fabricated with modified copings. Master casts fabricated for both groups were analyzed to detect rotational position change of the hexagon on the implant replicas in the master casts in reference to the resin model.

RESULTS

The rotational position changes of the hexagon on implant replicas were significantly less variable in the master casts obtained with the modified impression copings than in the master casts achieved with the nonprepared copings.

CONCLUSION

Improved precision of the impression was achieved when the adhesive-coated copings were used.

摘要

问题陈述

将单个种植体六角形头部的位置转移到工作模型时的不准确性,可能会导致最终的单颗牙冠在临床上出现与技术人员制作的主模型上的接触不同的咬合和/或邻面接触。

目的

本体外研究评估了使用方形取模印模帽进行单颗牙替换时获得的主模型的准确性。使用的印模帽为:(1)制造商销售的印模帽,以及(2)在最终印模程序前对其粗糙表面进行喷砂处理并涂覆印模粘合剂的改良印模帽。

材料与方法

使用带有标准单颗种植体的聚合树脂模型模拟临床情况。一组20个印模使用未改良的印模帽制作;另一组20个印模使用改良后的印模帽制作。对两组制作的主模型进行分析,以检测主模型中种植体复制件上六边形相对于树脂模型的旋转位置变化。

结果

与使用未处理印模帽获得的主模型相比,使用改良印模帽获得的主模型中种植体复制件上六边形的旋转位置变化明显更小。

结论

使用涂有粘合剂的印模帽时,印模的精度得到了提高。

相似文献

1
In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement.单颗牙种植修复模型精度的体外比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 May;83(5):562-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70015-1.
2
Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.单颗牙种植修复病例中 master cast 的精度:一项体外比较。技术说明。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):455-60.
3
Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.用于多个种植体基台印模的三种技术的准确性评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Feb;89(2):186-92. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.15.
4
An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.多内部连接种植体修复体印模技术的评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Nov;92(5):470-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.015.
5
An in vitro study to compare the accuracy of the master cast fabricated by four different transfer impression techniques for single-tooth implant replacement.一项体外研究,比较四种不同转移印模技术制作的单颗牙种植修复主模型的准确性。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Mar;14(1):78-84. doi: 10.1007/s13191-013-0275-5. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
6
Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.不同印模台类型和形状的种植体印模精度。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Apr;14(2):218-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00241.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
7
Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.种植体支持修复体的印模和灌注技术的准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):226-36.
8
An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.种植体印模的准确性比较:编码愈合基台和不同种植体角度的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):90-100. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60346-7.
9
Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.不同印模材料和技术获取的多种内连接种植体修复体模型的精度评估:一项体外研究
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Apr;40(2):137-45. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00207. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
10
Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures.骨结合种植体支持的上部结构印模准确性的评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 May;83(5):555-61. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70014-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of soft tissue thickness on accuracy of conventional and digital implant impression techniques.软组织厚度对传统和数字化种植体印模技术准确性的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):1318. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05037-4.
2
Alterations in internal threads of implant analog of different materials after multiple reuse.多次重复使用后不同材料种植体代型内螺纹的改变。
Bioinformation. 2024 Jun 30;20(6):695-699. doi: 10.6026/973206300200695. eCollection 2024.
3
The Accuracy of Casts Obtained Using Different Impression Techniques and Impression Materials in Combined Parallel and Angulated Implants: An In Vitro Study.
在联合平行和角度种植体中使用不同印模技术和印模材料获得的铸型的准确性:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 28;16(4):e59193. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59193. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Effect of Repeated Use of Different Types of Scan Bodies on Transfer Accuracy of Implant Position.不同类型扫描体的重复使用对种植体位置转移精度的影响。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2023 Dec 1;24(4):410-416. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.96149.1922. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Comparative Evaluation of the Rigidity and Accuracy of Different Elastomeric Impression Materials with Open Tray Implant Level Impression Technique-An Study.采用开放式托盘种植体水平印模技术对不同弹性印模材料的刚性和准确性进行比较评估——一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1262-S1265. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_131_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
6
Influence of Implant Angulation and Implant Number on the Accuracy of Definitive Casts.种植体角度和种植体数量对最终模型准确性的影响。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S367-S369. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_792_20. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
7
The impact of impression coping geometrical design on accuracy of implant impressions: an experimental study.印模帽几何设计对种植体印模准确性的影响:一项实验研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Oct 10;6(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00256-0.
8
Impact of design and length on the accuracy of closed tray transfer copings.设计和长度对封闭式托盘转移帽精度的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Aug 1;11(8):e707-e712. doi: 10.4317/jced.55588. eCollection 2019 Aug.
9
Evaluation of positional accuracy in multiple implants using four different splinting materials: An study.使用四种不同夹板材料对多个种植体位置准确性的评估:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Jul-Sep;18(3):239-247. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_27_18.
10
Accuracy of fit of implant-supported bars fabricated on definitive casts made by different dental stones.在由不同牙科石膏制作的最终模型上制作的种植体支持杆的贴合精度。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Mar 1;10(3):e252-e263. doi: 10.4317/jced.54603. eCollection 2018 Mar.