Vigolo Paolo, Fonzi Fulvio, Majzoub Zeina, Cordioli Giampiero
Department of Clinical Odontostomatology, University of Padova, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Padova, Italy.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):455-60.
This in vitro study evaluated the accuracy of master casts obtained by using (1) copings modified by sandblasting and coating their roughened surfaces with impression adhesive before final impression procedures and (2) gold machined UCLA abutments as impression copings in final impression procedures for single-tooth implant replacement cases.
A polymeric resin model with a standard single implant was used to simulate a clinical situation. A group of 20 impressions were made using square impression copings sandblasted to roughen their external surfaces at a supragingival level and then coated with Impregum polyether adhesive; a second group of 20 impressions were made using gold machined UCLA abutments as impression copings. The castable part of the UCLA abutments was secured with resin to the gold machined section of the UCLA abutment to prevent movement of the castable part itself on the gold machined portion during the impression procedures; the castable portion of the UCLA was also coated with the Impregum polyether adhesive to improve the stability of the gold machined UCLA abutment inside the impression material. Master casts fabricated for both groups were analyzed to detect rotational position change of the hexagon on the implant replicas in the master casts with reference to the resin model.
The rotational position changes of the hexagon on implant replicas were significantly less variable in the master casts obtained using gold machined UCLA abutments as impression copings than in the master casts achieved with the roughened square impression copings.
Improved precision of the impression was achieved when the gold machined UCLA abutments were used as impression copings.
This report suggests that using gold machined UCLA abutments as impression copings in the final impression procedures can enable the clinician to achieve a more accurate orientation of the implant replicas in the laboratory master casts for single-tooth implant replacement cases.
本体外研究评估了在单颗牙种植体替代病例的最终印模程序中,使用(1)经喷砂处理并在其粗糙表面涂覆印模粘合剂后进行最终印模程序的修复体,以及(2)金加工的加州大学洛杉矶分校基台作为印模修复体所获得的工作模型的准确性。
使用具有标准单颗种植体的聚合树脂模型模拟临床情况。一组20个印模使用方形印模修复体,在龈上水平对其外表面进行喷砂处理以使其粗糙,然后涂覆Impregum聚醚粘合剂;第二组20个印模使用金加工的加州大学洛杉矶分校基台作为印模修复体。加州大学洛杉矶分校基台的可铸造部分用树脂固定在加州大学洛杉矶分校基台的金加工部分上,以防止在印模程序期间可铸造部分自身在金加工部分上移动;加州大学洛杉矶分校基台的可铸造部分也涂覆了Impregum聚醚粘合剂,以提高金加工的加州大学洛杉矶分校基台在印模材料内的稳定性。对两组制作的工作模型进行分析,以检测工作模型中种植体复制件上六边形相对于树脂模型的旋转位置变化。
与使用粗糙方形印模修复体获得的工作模型相比,使用金加工的加州大学洛杉矶分校基台作为印模修复体获得的工作模型中,种植体复制件上六边形的旋转位置变化明显较小。
当使用金加工的加州大学洛杉矶分校基台作为印模修复体时,印模的精度得到了提高。
本报告表明,在最终印模程序中使用金加工的加州大学洛杉矶分校基台作为印模修复体,可使临床医生在单颗牙种植体替代病例的实验室工作模型中获得种植体复制件更准确的方向。