• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重毁损的肢体:何时应进行截肢?

The Mangled Extremity: When Should It Be Amputated?

作者信息

Dirschl DR, Dahners LE

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1996 Jul;4(4):182-190. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199607000-00002.

DOI:10.5435/00124635-199607000-00002
PMID:10795053
Abstract

Amputation of a mangled extremity is repugnant to the patient and the surgeon. However, prolonged unsuccessful attempts at salvage are costly, highly morbid, and sometimes lethal. Much discussion has taken place regarding which criteria predict successful salvage, and predictive indices have been proposed in an attempt to identify limbs for which attempted salvage is unlikely to succeed. The Mangled Extremity Severity Score, or MESS, system is the most thoroughly validated of the various classification systems, but at present there is no predictive scale that can be used with confidence to determine whether to amputate or attempt to salvage a mangled lower extremity. Therefore, these systems should serve only as guides to supplement the surgeon's clinical judgment and experience. Although salvage for severe injuries below the knee can be difficult and the functional outcome unpredictable, prosthetic function after transtibial amputation is generally good. Conversely, prosthetic function after transfemoral or transradial amputation is often poor, while salvage of some useful function for injuries above the knee is often successful. When limb loss is inevitable, immediate amputation is desirable. If obvious criteria for primary amputation are not met, however, it is reasonable to consider an initial salvage attempt, observation, and subsequent early secondary amputation.

摘要

对严重毁损的肢体进行截肢,这对患者和外科医生来说都是令人反感的。然而,长时间进行挽救肢体的尝试却未成功,这不仅代价高昂,还会导致严重的病态,有时甚至会危及生命。关于哪些标准能够预测挽救肢体的成功与否,已经进行了大量讨论,并且有人提出了预测指标,试图识别出那些尝试挽救肢体不太可能成功的情况。在各种分类系统中,严重毁损肢体严重程度评分(MESS)系统是经过最全面验证的,但目前还没有一种可以放心使用的预测量表来确定是进行截肢还是尝试挽救严重毁损的下肢。因此,这些系统仅应作为补充外科医生临床判断和经验的指导。虽然对膝下严重损伤进行挽救可能很困难,而且功能结果难以预测,但经胫骨截肢后的假肢功能通常良好。相反,经股骨或经桡骨截肢后的假肢功能往往较差,而对于膝上损伤保留一些有用功能的挽救手术往往是成功的。当肢体丧失不可避免时,应立即进行截肢。然而,如果不符合一期截肢的明显标准,那么考虑进行初步的挽救尝试、观察,随后尽早进行二期截肢是合理的。

相似文献

1
The Mangled Extremity: When Should It Be Amputated?严重毁损的肢体:何时应进行截肢?
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1996 Jul;4(4):182-190. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199607000-00002.
2
Critical evaluation of mangled extremity severity scoring system in Indian patients.对印度患者肢体严重损伤严重程度评分系统的批判性评估。
Injury. 2003 Jul;34(7):493-6. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00214-0.
3
Primary amputation vs limb salvage in mangled extremity: a systematic review of the current scoring system.严重毁损肢体的一期截肢与保肢治疗:当前评分系统的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec 2;16:372. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0832-7.
4
Reliability of the mangled extremity severity score in combat-related upper and lower extremity injuries.肢体严重损伤严重程度评分在与战斗相关的上肢和下肢损伤中的可靠性。
Indian J Orthop. 2015 Nov-Dec;49(6):656-60. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.168759.
5
Are We Justified Doing Salvage or Amputation Procedure Based on Mangled Extremity Severity Score in Mangled Upper Extremity Injury.对于上肢严重毁损伤,我们基于肢体毁损伤严重程度评分来进行挽救或截肢手术是否合理?
J Orthop Case Rep. 2017 Jan-Feb;7(1):3-8. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.662.
6
Salvage versus amputation: Utility of mangled extremity severity score in severely injured lower limbs.挽救与截肢:严重下肢损伤中肢体毁损严重程度评分的效用
Indian J Orthop. 2007 Jul;41(3):183-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.33679.
7
Utility of severity scoring systems for mangled upper limb salvage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.严重程度评分系统在挽救上肢毁损中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Injury. 2024 Apr;55(4):111447. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111447. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
8
Mangled lower extremity: can we trust the amputation scores?下肢严重毁损:我们能信赖截肢评分吗?
Int J Burns Trauma. 2012;2(1):51-8. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
9
Mangled Extremity Severity Score in the Assessment of Extremity Injuries - Is it Reliable?四肢损伤严重程度评分在四肢损伤评估中的应用——是否可靠?
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2023 Jul;57(5):445-450. doi: 10.1177/15385744231152024. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
10
Limb Salvage vs. Amputation: Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process and Outcomes for Mangled Extremity Injuries.保肢与截肢:影响严重肢体损伤决策过程及结果的因素
Cureus. 2022 Oct 28;14(10):e30817. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30817. eCollection 2022 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of initial ankle-foot prosthesis prescription patterns in U.S. Service members following unilateral transtibial amputation.美国单侧经胫骨截肢现役军人初始踝足假肢处方模式的特征分析
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Aug 25;4:1235693. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1235693. eCollection 2023.
2
Re-implantation of foot and ankle following crush injury of the distal leg with 22 cm bone deficit: A case report.小腿远端挤压伤伴22厘米骨缺损后足踝再植:1例病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Apr;105:108033. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108033. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
3
Limb Salvage vs. Amputation: Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process and Outcomes for Mangled Extremity Injuries.
保肢与截肢:影响严重肢体损伤决策过程及结果的因素
Cureus. 2022 Oct 28;14(10):e30817. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30817. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Utilization of arterial grafts in foot replantation.动脉移植物在足部再植中的应用。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2017 Mar 6;3(1):44-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2016.11.002. eCollection 2017 Mar.
5
Impact of Traumatic Lower Extremity Injuries Beyond Acute Care: Movement-Based Considerations for Resultant Longer Term Secondary Health Conditions.创伤性下肢损伤在急性护理之外的影响:对由此产生的长期继发性健康状况基于运动的考量
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017 Aug 1;6(8):269-278. doi: 10.1089/wound.2016.0714.
6
Are We Justified Doing Salvage or Amputation Procedure Based on Mangled Extremity Severity Score in Mangled Upper Extremity Injury.对于上肢严重毁损伤,我们基于肢体毁损伤严重程度评分来进行挽救或截肢手术是否合理?
J Orthop Case Rep. 2017 Jan-Feb;7(1):3-8. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.662.
7
Primary amputation vs limb salvage in mangled extremity: a systematic review of the current scoring system.严重毁损肢体的一期截肢与保肢治疗:当前评分系统的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec 2;16:372. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0832-7.
8
Principles of tendon reconstruction following complex trauma of the upper limb.上肢复杂性创伤后肌腱重建的原则。
Semin Plast Surg. 2015 Feb;29(1):30-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1544168.
9
Saving life and limb: limb salvage using external fixation, a multi-centre review of orthopaedic surgical activities in Médecins Sans Frontières.挽救生命与肢体:利用外固定术进行肢体挽救,无国界医生组织骨科手术活动的多中心回顾
Int Orthop. 2014 Aug;38(8):1555-61. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2451-6. Epub 2014 Jul 20.
10
Mangled lower extremity: can we trust the amputation scores?下肢严重毁损:我们能信赖截肢评分吗?
Int J Burns Trauma. 2012;2(1):51-8. Epub 2012 Feb 5.