Alfirevic Z, Neilson J P
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, L69 3BX.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000038.
Biophysical profile usually includes ultrasound monitoring of fetal movements, fetal tone and fetal breathing, ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid volume and assessment of fetal heart rate by electronic monitoring.
The objective of this review was to assess the effects of biophysical profile tests on pregnancy outcome in high risk pregnancies.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth trials register. Date of last search: October 1998.
Randomised trials comparing fetal biophysical profile with other forms of fetal assessment in women with high risk pregnancies.
Trial quality was assessed.
Four studies were included. Most trials were not of high quality. No difference was found between biophysical profile and other forms of fetal assessment over a range of fetal and neonatal measures.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: At present, there is not enough evidence from randomised trials to evaluate the use of biophysical profile as a test of fetal well-being in high risk pregnancies.
生物物理评分通常包括超声监测胎儿运动、胎儿肌张力和胎儿呼吸，超声评估羊水量以及通过电子监测评估胎儿心率。
本综述的目的是评估生物物理评分检查对高危妊娠结局的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩试验注册库。最后检索日期：1998年10月。
在高危妊娠女性中，比较胎儿生物物理评分与其他形式胎儿评估的随机试验。
评估了试验质量。
纳入了四项研究。大多数试验质量不高。在一系列胎儿和新生儿指标方面，生物物理评分与其他形式的胎儿评估之间未发现差异。
目前，随机试验中没有足够的证据来评估生物物理评分作为高危妊娠胎儿健康检查的应用。
