Suppr超能文献

高危妊娠胎儿评估的生物物理评分

Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies.

作者信息

Alfirevic Z, Neilson J P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, L69 3BX.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000038.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biophysical profile usually includes ultrasound monitoring of fetal movements, fetal tone and fetal breathing, ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid volume and assessment of fetal heart rate by electronic monitoring.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of biophysical profile tests on pregnancy outcome in high risk pregnancies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth trials register. Date of last search: October 1998.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing fetal biophysical profile with other forms of fetal assessment in women with high risk pregnancies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality was assessed.

MAIN RESULTS

Four studies were included. Most trials were not of high quality. No difference was found between biophysical profile and other forms of fetal assessment over a range of fetal and neonatal measures.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: At present, there is not enough evidence from randomised trials to evaluate the use of biophysical profile as a test of fetal well-being in high risk pregnancies.

摘要

背景

生物物理评分通常包括超声监测胎儿运动、胎儿肌张力和胎儿呼吸,超声评估羊水量以及通过电子监测评估胎儿心率。

目的

本综述的目的是评估生物物理评分检查对高危妊娠结局的影响。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩试验注册库。最后检索日期:1998年10月。

入选标准

在高危妊娠女性中,比较胎儿生物物理评分与其他形式胎儿评估的随机试验。

数据收集与分析

评估了试验质量。

主要结果

纳入了四项研究。大多数试验质量不高。在一系列胎儿和新生儿指标方面,生物物理评分与其他形式的胎儿评估之间未发现差异。

综述作者结论

目前,随机试验中没有足够的证据来评估生物物理评分作为高危妊娠胎儿健康检查的应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验