Pinelli J, Symington A
School of Nursing, McMaster University, 1200 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001071.
Non-nutritive sucking is used during gavage feeding and in the transition from gavage to breast/bottle feeding in preterm infants. The rationale for this intervention is that non-nutritive sucking facilitates the development of sucking behaviour and improves digestion of enteral feedings. Non-nutritive sucking has been considered to be a benign intervention, although it has the potential to have a negative effect on breastfeeding or on the incidence of later oral aversion.
To determine whether non-nutritive sucking (NNS) in preterm infants influences: a) weight gain, b) energy intake, c) heart rate, d) oxygen saturation, e) length of hospital stay, f) intestinal transit time, g) age at full oral feeds, or h) any other clinically relevant outcomes.
MEDLINE and CINAHL databases back to 1976 and the Cochrane Controlled Trials register were searched. Reference lists/bibliographies of relevant articles and reviews were also searched. A comprehensive list of relevant articles was sent to two major authors in this area. They were asked if they knew of any other published or unpublished studies relevant to the area that had not been included in the original list.
All trials utilizing experimental or quasi-experimental designs in which non-nutritive sucking in preterm infants was compared to no provision of non-nutritive sucking. Measured clinically relevant outcomes. Reports were in English or a language for which a translator was available. Computerized searches were conducted by both reviewers. All potentially relevant titles and abstracts identified by either reviewer were extracted. All retrieved articles were assessed for relevance independently by each reviewer, based on a pre-determined set of criteria. The reference lists/bibliographies of each article were reviewed independently for additional relevant titles and were also retrieved and assessed for relevance. Articles that met all relevance criteria were then assessed for methodologic quality based on a predetermined set of criteria. Those articles judged to have the appropriate quality by both reviewers were included in the analysis.
Data were extracted independently by the two authors. No subgroup analyses were performed because of the small number of studies related to the relevant outcomes.
This review consisted of 19 studies, 13 of which were randomized controlled trials. NNS was found to decrease significantly the length of hospital stay in preterm infants. The review did not reveal a consistent benefit of NNS with respect to other major clinical variables (weight gain, energy intake, heart rate, oxygen saturation, intestinal transit time, and age at full oral feeds). The review identified other positive clinical outcomes of NNS: transition from tube to bottle feeds and behavior. No negative outcomes were reported in any of the studies.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: This review found a significant decrease in length of stay in preterm infants receiving a NNS intervention. The review did not reveal a consistent benefit of NNS with respect to other major clinical variables (weight gain, energy intake, heart rate, oxygen saturation, intestinal transit time, and age at full oral feeds). The review identified other positive clinical outcomes of NNS: transition from tube to bottle feeds and behavior. No negative outcomes were reported in any of the studies. There were also a number of limitations of the presently available evidence related to the design of the studies, outcome variability, and lack of long-term data. Based on the available evidence, NNS in preterm infants would appear to have some clinical benefit. It does not appear to have any short-term negative effects. In view of the fact that there are no long-term data, further investigations are recommended. In order to facilitate meta-analysis of these data, future research in this area should involve outcome measures
非营养性吸吮用于早产儿的管饲喂养期间以及从管饲过渡到母乳喂养/奶瓶喂养的过程中。这种干预措施的理论依据是,非营养性吸吮有助于吸吮行为的发展,并改善肠内喂养的消化情况。尽管非营养性吸吮有可能对母乳喂养或日后出现口腔厌恶的发生率产生负面影响,但一直被视为一种良性干预措施。
确定早产儿的非营养性吸吮(NNS)是否会影响:a)体重增加,b)能量摄入,c)心率,d)血氧饱和度,e)住院时间,f)肠道转运时间,g)完全经口喂养的年龄,或h)任何其他临床相关结局。
检索了自1976年起的MEDLINE和CINAHL数据库以及Cochrane对照试验注册库。还检索了相关文章和综述的参考文献列表/书目。向该领域的两位主要作者发送了一份相关文章的综合列表。询问他们是否知晓与该领域相关的任何其他已发表或未发表的研究,而这些研究未被列入原始列表中。
所有采用实验性或半实验性设计的试验,其中将早产儿的非营养性吸吮与不进行非营养性吸吮进行比较。测量临床相关结局。报告为英文或有翻译可用的语言。两位评审员均进行了计算机检索。提取了两位评审员确定的所有潜在相关标题和摘要。每位评审员根据预先确定的一组标准独立评估所有检索到的文章的相关性。独立审查每篇文章的参考文献列表/书目,以查找其他相关标题,并检索这些标题并评估其相关性。然后根据预先确定的一组标准评估符合所有相关性标准的文章的方法学质量。两位评审员均判定质量合适的文章纳入分析。
两位作者独立提取数据。由于与相关结局相关的研究数量较少,未进行亚组分析。
本综述包括19项研究,其中13项为随机对照试验。发现非营养性吸吮可显著缩短早产儿的住院时间。该综述未揭示非营养性吸吮在其他主要临床变量(体重增加、能量摄入、心率、血氧饱和度、肠道转运时间和完全经口喂养的年龄)方面具有一致的益处。该综述确定了非营养性吸吮的其他积极临床结局:从管饲过渡到奶瓶喂养以及行为。任何研究均未报告负面结局。
本综述发现接受非营养性吸吮干预的早产儿住院时间显著缩短。该综述未揭示非营养性吸吮在其他主要临床变量(体重增加、能量摄入、心率、血氧饱和度、肠道转运时间和完全经口喂养的年龄)方面具有一致的益处。该综述确定了非营养性吸吮的其他积极临床结局:从管饲过渡到奶瓶喂养以及行为。任何研究均未报告负面结局。目前可得的证据在研究设计、结局变异性和缺乏长期数据方面也存在一些局限性。基于现有证据,早产儿的非营养性吸吮似乎具有一定的临床益处。它似乎没有任何短期负面影响。鉴于没有长期数据,建议进一步开展研究。为便于对这些数据进行荟萃分析,该领域未来的研究应涉及结局测量指标