Suppr超能文献

促进早产儿发育和预防发病的发育照护

Developmental care for promoting development and preventing morbidity in preterm infants.

作者信息

Symington A, Pinelli J

机构信息

Acute Children's Services, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, P.O. Box 2000, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD001814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001814.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preterm infants experience a range of morbidity related to the immaturity of their organ systems and to concurrent disease states. An unfavourable environment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may compound this morbidity. Modification of the environment could minimize the iatrogenic effects. Developmental care is a broad category of interventions designed to minimize the stress of the NICU environment. These interventions may include one or more elements such as control of external stimuli (vestibular, auditory, visual, tactile), clustering of nursery care activities, and positioning or swaddling of the preterm infant. Individual strategies have also been combined to form programs, such as the 'Neonatal Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program' (NIDCAP) (Als 1986).

OBJECTIVES

In preterm infants, do developmental care interventions reduce neurodevelopmental delay, poor weight gain, length of hospital stay, length of mechanical ventilation, physiological stress and other clinically relevant adverse outcomes?

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Neonatal Review Group search strategy was utilized. Searches were made of Medline from 1966 to July, 2000, and of CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and conference and symposia proceedings in the English language from 1990 to July, 2000. A list of all relevant articles was sent to two experts in the field to identify any omissions or additional unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials in which elements of developmental care are compared to routine nursery care for infants < 37 weeks gestation and that measured clinically relevant outcomes. Reports were in English or a language for which a translator was available. Computerized searches were conducted and all potentially relevant titles and abstracts were extracted. Retrieved articles were assessed for relevance independently by two reviewers, based on predetermined criteria. Articles that met all criteria for relevance were assessed for methodological quality based on predetermined criteria. Articles judged to have the appropriate quality by both reviewers were included in the analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by the two authors. Meta-analyses were conducted for each intervention where the same outcome measures and/or instruments were used within comparable time points.

MAIN RESULTS

This review detected 31 eligible randomized controlled trials involving four major groups of developmental care interventions, 19 sub-groups and multiple clinical outcomes. The results of the review indicate that developmental care interventions demonstrate some benefit to preterm infants with respect to: improved short-term growth outcomes, decreased respiratory support, decreased length and cost of hospital stay, and improved neurodevelopmental outcomes to 24 months corrected age. These findings were based on two or three small trials for each outcome, and did not involve meta-analyses of more than two trials for any one outcome. Although a number of other benefits were demonstrated, those results were from single studies with small sample sizes. The lack of blinding of the assessors was a significant methodological flaw in half of the studies. The cost of the interventions and personnel was not considered in any of the studies.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Because of the inclusion of multiple interventions in most studies, the determination of the effect of any single intervention is difficult. Although there is evidence of some benefit of developmental care interventions overall, and no major harmful effects reported, there were a large number of outcomes for which no or conflicting effects were demonstrated. The single trials that did show a significant effect of an intervention on a major clinical outcome were based on small sample sizes, and the findings were often not supported in other small trials. Before a clear direction for practice can be supported, evidence demonstrating more consistent effects of developmental care interventions on important short- and long-term clinical outcomes is needed. The economic impact of the implementation and maintenance of developmental care practices should be considered by individual institutions.

摘要

背景

早产儿会经历一系列与器官系统不成熟及并发疾病状态相关的发病情况。新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中的不良环境可能会使这种发病情况更加复杂。改善环境可以将医源性影响降至最低。发育照护是一类广泛的干预措施,旨在尽量减少NICU环境带来的压力。这些干预措施可能包括一个或多个要素,如控制外部刺激(前庭、听觉、视觉、触觉)、集中护理活动以及对早产儿进行体位摆放或包裹。个别策略也被组合成各种项目,如“新生儿个体化发育照护与评估项目”(NIDCAP)(Als,1986年)。

目的

对于早产儿,发育照护干预措施是否能减少神经发育延迟、体重增加不佳、住院时间、机械通气时间、生理应激及其他临床相关不良后果?

检索策略

采用了新生儿综述小组的检索策略。检索了1966年至2000年7月的Medline,以及1990年至2000年7月的CINAHL、考克兰图书馆以及英文的会议和研讨会论文集。将所有相关文章列表发送给该领域的两位专家,以确定是否有遗漏或其他未发表的研究。

入选标准

将发育照护要素与常规护理相比较的随机试验,受试婴儿为孕周小于37周且测量了临床相关结局。报告语言为英语或有翻译可用的语言。进行了计算机检索并提取了所有可能相关的标题和摘要。由两位评审员根据预定标准独立评估检索到的文章的相关性。符合所有相关性标准的文章根据预定标准评估方法学质量。两位评审员均判定质量合适的文章纳入分析。

数据收集与分析

由两位作者独立提取数据。对在可比时间点使用相同结局测量指标和/或工具的每种干预措施进行荟萃分析。

主要结果

本综述发现了31项符合条件的随机对照试验,涉及四大类发育照护干预措施、19个亚组和多个临床结局。综述结果表明,发育照护干预措施在以下方面对早产儿显示出一定益处:改善短期生长结局、减少呼吸支持、缩短住院时间和降低住院费用,以及改善至矫正年龄24个月时的神经发育结局。这些发现基于每个结局的两三项小型试验,且未对任何一个结局进行超过两项试验的荟萃分析。虽然还显示出许多其他益处,但这些结果来自样本量较小的单一研究。评估者未设盲是一半研究中的一个重大方法学缺陷。所有研究均未考虑干预措施和人员的成本。

评审结论

由于大多数研究纳入了多种干预措施,很难确定任何单一干预措施的效果。虽然总体上有证据表明发育照护干预措施有一定益处,且未报告重大有害影响,但有大量结局未显示出效果或结果相互矛盾。确实显示某项干预措施对主要临床结局有显著效果的单一试验基于小样本量,且这些发现往往在其他小型试验中得不到支持。在能够支持明确的实践方向之前,需要有证据表明发育照护干预措施对重要的短期和长期临床结局有更一致的效果。各机构应考虑实施和维持发育照护措施的经济影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验