Suppr超能文献

男性不育症采用定时性交与宫内人工授精(无论是否进行卵巢超刺激)的比较

Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men.

作者信息

Cohlen B J, Vandekerckhove P, te Velde E R, Habbema J D

机构信息

Department of Reproductive medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CX.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000360.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although intra-uterine insemination (IUI) is widely used, however its effectiveness remains a matter of debate. Although IUI is less invasive and expensive than IVF or GIFT, it should only be applied if the probability of conception is improved significantly as compared to the natural chance of conceiving. To increase the number of available oocytes at the site of fertilization, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) can be applied in conjunction with IUI. Uncontrolled studies suggest a beneficial effect of COH in combination with IUI, also when a male factor is present. To be able to draw firm conclusions whether IUI and/or COH improve the probability of conception, several comparisons should be performed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVES

To determine for male subfertility whether intrauterine insemination (IUI) improves the probability of conception compared with timed intercourse and whether the addition of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation influences the results.

SEARCH STRATEGY

  1. The specialist database of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group. 2. Medline search. 3. Embase search. 4. DDFU search. 5. BIOSIS search. 6. SCIsearch. 7. Manual searching of references mentioned in the obtained studies. 8. Personal communication and write letters to experts (14) in the field. 9. Abstracts of The American Society for Reproductive Medicine and European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology Meetings. When important information is lacking from the original publications the authors will be contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials only.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Independently by the first 2 authors: 1. Trial design characteristics. 2. Baseline characteristics of participants. 3. Types of intervention. 4. Outcomes where pregnancy is the outcome of main interest. Number of multiple pregnancies and number of cycles with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) are secondary outcomes. Analysis of agreement between the two observers was determined for the following items: inclusion or exclusion of a trial, method of randomization, definition of male subfertility, design of the trial, number of pregnancies and completed cycles. Sensitivity analysis is performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen trials fulfilled the selection criteria for this review and were included. Four trials are pending. Crude agreement concerning inclusion or exclusion of trials occurred for 41 of 43 (95%) trials reviewed (kappa 0.90). The included trials comprised 3,662 completed cycles. In natural cycles intrauterine insemination (IUI) significantly improved the probability of conception compared with timed intercourse (TI) (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 2.43, 1.54 - 3.83). In cycles with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) IUI significantly improved the probability of conception also compared with TI (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 2.14, 1.30 - 3.51). Despite clinical heterogeneity, these results are based on strong evidence. Intrauterine insemination in cycles with COH improved the probability of conception compared with IUI in natural cycles but significance was not reached (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 1.79, 0.98 - 3.25). Comparing IUI in COH-cycles with TI in natural cycles the first treatment modality significantly improved the probability of conception (combined odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 6.23, 2.35 - 16.52).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Intra-uterine insemination offers couples with male subfertility benefit over timed intercourse, both in natural cycles and in cycles with COH. In the case of a severe semen defect (with more than 1 million motile sperm after semen preparation and no triple sperm defect) IUI in natural cycles should be the treatment of first choice. The value of COH need to be further investigated in RCTs. Mild ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotrophins is advised in cases with less sever

摘要

背景

尽管宫腔内人工授精(IUI)被广泛应用,但其有效性仍存在争议。虽然IUI比体外受精(IVF)或配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)侵入性小且费用低,但只有在与自然受孕几率相比受孕概率显著提高时才应应用。为了增加受精部位可用卵母细胞的数量,控制性卵巢过度刺激(COH)可与IUI联合应用。非对照研究表明,COH与IUI联合应用有有益效果,即使存在男性因素时也是如此。为了能够得出关于IUI和/或COH是否提高受孕概率的确切结论,应在随机对照试验(RCT)中进行多项比较。

目的

对于男性不育症,确定宫腔内人工授精(IUI)与定时性交相比是否提高受孕概率,以及添加控制性卵巢过度刺激是否影响结果。

检索策略

  1. 考克兰月经紊乱与不育症小组的专业数据库。2. 医学索引数据库检索。3. 荷兰医学文摘数据库检索。4. 丹麦药物文摘数据库检索。5. 生物学文摘数据库检索。6. 科学引文索引数据库检索。7. 对所获研究中提及的参考文献进行手工检索。8. 个人交流并给该领域的专家(14位)写信。9. 美国生殖医学学会和欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会会议的摘要。当原始出版物缺乏重要信息时,将与作者联系。

入选标准

仅随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

由前两位作者独立进行:1.试验设计特征。2.参与者的基线特征。3.干预类型。4.以妊娠为主要关注结果的结局。多胎妊娠数和卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)周期数为次要结局。对以下项目确定两位观察者之间的一致性分析:试验的纳入或排除、随机化方法、男性不育的定义、试验设计、妊娠数和完成的周期数。进行敏感性分析。

主要结果

17项试验符合本综述的入选标准并被纳入。4项试验待定。在所审查的43项试验中的41项(95%)关于试验纳入或排除的粗略一致性出现(卡帕值0.90)。纳入的试验包括3662个完成的周期。在自然周期中,宫腔内人工授精(IUI)与定时性交(TI)相比显著提高受孕概率(合并比值比及95%置信区间:2.43,1.54 - 3.8)。在控制性卵巢过度刺激(COH)周期中,IUI与TI相比也显著提高受孕概率(合并比值比及95%置信区间:2.14,1.30 - 3.51)。尽管存在临床异质性,但这些结果基于有力证据。COH周期中的IUI与自然周期中的IUI相比提高了受孕概率,但未达到显著性(合并比值比及95%置信区间:1.79,0.98 - 3.25)。将COH周期中的IUI与自然周期中的TI相比,第一种治疗方式显著提高受孕概率(合并比值比及95%置信区间:6.23,2.35 - 16.52)。

综述作者结论

对于男性不育夫妇,宫腔内人工授精在自然周期和COH周期中都比定时性交更有益。在精液严重缺陷的情况下(精液处理后有超过100万个活动精子且无三重精子缺陷),自然周期中的IUI应是首选治疗方法。COH的价值需要在RCT中进一步研究。对于不太严重的情况,建议用促性腺激素进行轻度卵巢过度刺激。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验