Suppr超能文献

紧急避孕的干预措施。

Interventions for emergency contraception.

作者信息

Cheng L, Gülmezoglu A M, Ezcurra E, Van Look P F

机构信息

UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, 1211-Geneva 27, SWITZERLAND.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine which emergency contraceptive method following unprotected intercourse is the most effective, safe and convenient for use in preventing pregnancy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy included electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Popline, Chinese biomedical databases and HRP emergency contraception database. In addition, references of retrieved papers were searched and researchers in the field and two pharmaceutical companies were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized or quasi-randomized studies including women attending services for emergency contraception following a single act of unprotected intercourse were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data on outcomes and trial characteristics were extracted in duplicate by two reviewers. Results were expressed as relative risk using a fixed-effects model with 95 % confidence interval.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen trials were included in the review. The majority (8/15) of the trials were conducted in China. Most comparisons between different interventions included one or two trials although some trials were appropriately sized with power calculations. Levonorgestrel appears to be more effective than Yuzpe regimen (2 trials, RR: 0.51, 95 % CI: 0.31-0.84) and causes less side-effects (RR: 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.76 to 0.84). Levonorgestrel was less effective than locally manufactured mifepristone in a single, large Chinese study (RR: 2.17, 95 % CI: 1.00 to 4.77). Effectiveness of different doses of mifepristone seem to be similar but the frequency of delay in onset of the subsequent menstrual period increases with increased dose.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Levonorgestrel and mifepristone seem to offer the highest efficacy with an acceptable side-effect profile. One disadvantage of mifepristone is that it causes delays in onset of subsequent menses which may induce anxiety. However, this seems to be dose-related and low doses of mifepristone minimise this side-effect without compromising effectiveness. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of mifepristone with levonorgestrel.

摘要

目的

确定无保护性交后哪种紧急避孕方法在预防妊娠方面最有效、安全且使用方便。

检索策略

检索策略包括对考克兰对照试验注册库、Popline、中国生物医学数据库和HRP紧急避孕数据库进行电子检索。此外,还检索了检索论文的参考文献,并联系了该领域的研究人员和两家制药公司。

选择标准

纳入的随机或半随机研究需包含单次无保护性交后寻求紧急避孕服务的女性。

数据收集与分析

两名评审员对结局和试验特征数据进行了重复提取。结果采用固定效应模型以相对风险表示,并给出95%置信区间。

主要结果

本综述纳入了15项试验。大多数试验(8/15)在中国进行。不同干预措施之间的大多数比较包含一两项试验,不过一些试验通过功效计算确定了合适的样本量。左炔诺孕酮似乎比Yuzpe方案更有效(2项试验,RR:0.51,95%CI:0.31 - 0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验