Norton C, Hosker G, Brazzelli M
Physiology Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford Road, Harrow, UK, HA1 3UJ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD002111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002111.
Faecal incontinence is a particularly embarrassing and distressing condition with significant medical, social and economic implications. Sphincter exercises and biofeedback therapy have been used to treat the symptoms of people with faecal incontinence. However, standards of treatment are still lacking and the magnitude of alleged benefits has yet to be established.
To determine the effects of biofeedback and/or anal sphincter exercises/pelvic floor muscle training for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults.
We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase and all reference lists of relevant articles up to November 1999. Date of the most recent searches: November 1999.
All randomised or quasi-randomised trials evaluating biofeedback and/or anal sphincter exercises in adults with faecal incontinence.
Three reviewers assessed the methodological quality of eligible trials and two reviewers independently extracted data from included trials. A wide range of outcome measures were considered.
Only five eligible studies were identified with a total of 109 participants. In the majority of trials methodological quality was poor or uncertain. All trials were small and employed a limited range of outcome measures. Follow-up information was not consistently reported amongst trials. Only two trials provided data in a form suitable for statistical analyses. There are suggestions that rectal volume discrimination training improves continence more than sham training and that anal biofeedback combined with exercises and electrical stimulation provides more short-term benefits than vaginal biofeedback and exercises for women with obstetric-related faecal incontinence. Further conclusions are not warranted from the available data.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The limited number of identified trials together with their methodological weaknesses do not allow a reliable assessment of the possible role of sphincter exercises and biofeedback therapy in the management of people with faecal incontinence. There is a suggestions that some elements of biofeedback therapy and sphincter exercises may have a therapeutic effect, but this is not certain. Larger well-designed trials are needed to enable safe conclusions.
大便失禁是一种特别令人尴尬和苦恼的病症,具有重大的医学、社会和经济影响。括约肌锻炼和生物反馈疗法已被用于治疗大便失禁患者的症状。然而,治疗标准仍然缺乏,所谓益处的程度尚未确定。
确定生物反馈和/或肛门括约肌锻炼/盆底肌肉训练对治疗成人大便失禁的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane尿失禁组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验注册库、Medline、Embase以及截至1999年11月相关文章的所有参考文献列表。最近一次检索日期:1999年11月。
所有评估生物反馈和/或肛门括约肌锻炼对成人大便失禁患者疗效的随机或半随机试验。
三名评价者评估符合条件试验的方法学质量,两名评价者独立从纳入试验中提取数据。考虑了广泛的结局指标。
仅确定了5项符合条件的研究,共有109名参与者。在大多数试验中,方法学质量较差或不确定。所有试验规模较小,采用的结局指标范围有限。各试验之间随访信息报告不一致。只有两项试验提供了适合进行统计分析的数据形式。有迹象表明,直肠容量辨别训练比假训练更能改善控便能力,对于与产科相关的大便失禁女性,肛门生物反馈联合锻炼和电刺激比阴道生物反馈和锻炼能提供更多短期益处。现有数据无法得出进一步结论。
已确定试验数量有限及其方法学缺陷,无法对括约肌锻炼和生物反馈疗法在大便失禁管理中的可能作用进行可靠评估。有迹象表明生物反馈疗法和括约肌锻炼的某些要素可能具有治疗效果,但尚不确定。需要开展规模更大、设计良好的试验以得出可靠结论。