Mayo N E, Wood-Dauphinee S, Côté R, Gayton D, Carlton J, Buttery J, Tamblyn R
Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Stroke. 2000 May;31(5):1016-23. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.5.1016.
Because stroke management is aimed at facilitating community reintegration, it would be logical that the sooner the patient can be discharged home, the sooner reintegration can commence. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of prompt discharge combined with home rehabilitation on function, community reintegration, and health-related quality of life during the first 3 months after stroke.
A randomized trial was carried out involving patients who required rehabilitation services and who had a caregiver at home. When medically ready for discharge, persons with stroke were randomized to either the home intervention group (n=58) or the usual care group (n=56). The home group received a 4-week, tailor-made home program of rehabilitation and nursing services; persons randomized to the usual care group received services provided through a variety of mechanisms, depending on institutional, care provider, and personal preference. The main outcome measure was the Physical Health component of the Measuring Outcomes Study Short-Form-36 (SF-36). Associated outcomes measures included the Timed Up & Go (TUG), Barthel Index (BI), the Older Americans Resource Scale for instrumental activities of daily living (OARS-IADL), Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL), and the SF-36 Mental Health component.
The total length of stay for the home group was, on average, 10 days, 6 days shorter than that for the usual care group. There were no differences between the 2 groups on the BI or on the TUG at either 1 or 3 months after stroke; however, there was a significantly beneficial impact of the home intervention on IADL and reintegration (RNL). By 3 months after stroke, the home intervention group showed a significantly higher score on the SF-36 Physical Health component than the usual care group. The total number of services received by the home group was actually lower than that received by the usual care group.
Prompt discharge combined with home rehabilitation appeared to translate motor and functional gains that occur through natural recovery and rehabilitation into a greater degree of higher-level function and satisfaction with community reintegration, and these in turn were translated into a better physical health.
由于中风管理旨在促进患者重新融入社区,所以患者能越早出院回家,就能越早开始重新融入,这是合乎逻辑的。本研究的目的是确定在中风后的前3个月内,快速出院联合家庭康复对功能、社区重新融入以及健康相关生活质量的有效性。
开展了一项随机试验,纳入需要康复服务且家中有照料者的患者。当中风患者在医学上准备好出院时,将其随机分为家庭干预组(n = 58)或常规护理组(n = 56)。家庭干预组接受为期4周的量身定制的家庭康复和护理服务计划;随机分配到常规护理组的患者根据机构、护理提供者和个人偏好,通过多种机制接受服务。主要结局指标是《测量结局研究简表36》(SF - 36)中的身体健康分量表。相关结局指标包括定时起立行走测试(TUG)、巴氏指数(BI)、美国老年人日常生活工具性活动资源量表(OARS - IADL)、恢复正常生活量表(RNL)以及SF - 36心理健康分量表。
家庭干预组的平均住院总时长为10天,比常规护理组短6天。中风后1个月或3个月时,两组在BI或TUG方面无差异;然而,家庭干预对日常生活工具性活动(IADL)和重新融入(RNL)有显著有益影响。到中风后3个月时,家庭干预组在SF - 36身体健康分量表上的得分显著高于常规护理组。家庭干预组实际接受的服务总数低于常规护理组。
快速出院联合家庭康复似乎能将通过自然恢复和康复所获得的运动和功能改善转化为更高水平的功能以及对社区重新融入的更高满意度,而这些又进而转化为更好的身体健康状况。