Lemack G E, Zimmern P E
Department of Urology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
J Urol. 2000 Jun;163(6):1823-8.
We refined recently developed pressure flow cutoff values for female bladder outlet obstruction and applied these values in a consecutive group of women undergoing urodynamic testing for various lower urinary tract symptoms.
A total of 87 women with clinical obstruction determined by history and presenting complaint were enrolled in our prospective evaluation of pressure flow studies. We identified 3 groups of participants according to the suspected cause of obstruction, including prolapse in 33, previous incontinence surgery in 25, and no likely source of obstruction identified from history and physical examination only in 29. An additional 124 patients presenting for evaluation of stress urinary incontinence served as controls. Optimal cutoff values for determining obstruction were developed using receiver operating characteristic curves. To determine the prevalence of bladder outlet obstruction these values were prospectively applied to 106 women undergoing urodynamics for various voiding complaints.
In controls the average maximum flow rate was 23 cc per second and average detrusor pressure was 21.9 cm. water, whereas the corresponding values in those with clinical obstruction were 10.7 cc per second and 40.8 cm. water (p <0.001). No differences were noted in the various obstruction groups. Receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that cutoff values of 11 cc per second or less and 21 cm. water or more optimized the selection of patients with bladder outlet obstruction. Using these values we noted a bladder outlet obstruction prevalence of 20% in a consecutive cohort of women undergoing urodynamic studies at our center.
We propose cutoff pressure flow values for identifying women with bladder outlet obstruction although they should be used only in conjunction with the overall clinical situation. Neither pressure flow data only nor clinical symptoms alone may be sufficient for diagnosing obstruction in women.
我们对最近制定的女性膀胱出口梗阻压力流截断值进行了优化,并将这些值应用于一组连续的因各种下尿路症状接受尿动力学检查的女性患者。
共有87名根据病史和当前主诉确定存在临床梗阻的女性纳入我们对压力流研究的前瞻性评估。我们根据疑似梗阻原因将参与者分为3组,包括33例子宫脱垂患者、25例既往有尿失禁手术史的患者以及仅通过病史和体格检查未发现可能梗阻源的29例患者。另外124例因压力性尿失禁前来评估的患者作为对照。使用受试者操作特征曲线制定确定梗阻的最佳截断值。为了确定膀胱出口梗阻的患病率,将这些值前瞻性地应用于106例因各种排尿主诉接受尿动力学检查的女性患者。
对照组平均最大尿流率为每秒23毫升,平均逼尿肌压力为21.9厘米水柱,而临床梗阻患者的相应值分别为每秒10.7毫升和40.8厘米水柱(p<0.001)。各梗阻组之间未发现差异。受试者操作特征分析显示,每秒11毫升或更低以及21厘米水柱或更高的截断值可优化膀胱出口梗阻患者的选择。使用这些值,我们发现在我们中心接受尿动力学研究的连续女性队列中膀胱出口梗阻患病率为20%。
我们提出了用于识别女性膀胱出口梗阻的截断压力流值,不过这些值应仅结合整体临床情况使用。仅压力流数据或仅临床症状可能都不足以诊断女性的梗阻。