Suppr超能文献

骨质疏松症与植入物失败:一项探索性病例对照研究。

Osteoporosis and implant failure: an exploratory case-control study.

作者信息

Becker W, Hujoel P P, Becker B E, Willingham H

机构信息

University of Southern California, School of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2000 Apr;71(4):625-31. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.625.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis has been suggested as a risk factor for implant failure, but data supporting such a link are limited.

METHODS

A case-control study was designed to evaluate the association between osteoporosis and dental implant failure. Cases (n = 49) and controls (n = 49) were selected from a private practice. The following measures were collected for each patient: 1) peripheral dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (pDEXA) bone measurements at the distal and proximal radius and ulna; 2) classification of bone quality and quantity at the time of implant placement; and 3) questionnaire data regarding potentially confounding variables. Generalized estimating equations were used to relate the likelihood of having at least one implant failure in an individual to osteoporosis measures.

RESULTS

The results suggested that there was no association between pDEXA scores at the radius and ulna and the risk for implant failure. For every 1-unit increase in bone density as measured by pDEXA t-score at proximal and distal radius and ulna, the risk for a patient to lose at least one implant changed by +14% and -6%, respectively (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.62 and odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.23). The simple visual assessment of local bone quality had a moderately sized relationship to implant failure. Implants placed in sites with thin cortical bone increased the chance for a patient to lose at least one implant by 130% when compared to implants placed in a thick cortical layer or compact bone (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-5.4).

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study suggests that a simple visual assessment of bone quality at the site of implant placement may be more informative regarding implant failure than pDEXA bone density measures obtained at peripheral bones. In order to determine whether peripheral osteoporosis measurements have a small or moderate association with implant loss, studies with larger sample sizes will be required.

摘要

背景

骨质疏松被认为是种植体失败的一个风险因素,但支持这种关联的数据有限。

方法

设计了一项病例对照研究来评估骨质疏松与牙种植体失败之间的关联。病例组(n = 49)和对照组(n = 49)选自一家私人诊所。为每位患者收集了以下指标:1)桡骨和尺骨远端及近端的外周双能X线吸收法(pDEXA)骨测量值;2)种植体植入时骨质量和骨量的分类;3)关于潜在混杂变量的问卷调查数据。使用广义估计方程将个体中至少有一个种植体失败的可能性与骨质疏松测量值相关联。

结果

结果表明,桡骨和尺骨的pDEXA评分与种植体失败风险之间没有关联。桡骨近端和远端及尺骨近端和远端通过pDEXA t值测量的骨密度每增加1个单位,患者失去至少一个种植体的风险分别变化 +14% 和 -6%(比值比,1.14;95% 置信区间,0.80 - 1.62;比值比,0.94;95% 置信区间,0.71 - 1.23)。对局部骨质量的简单视觉评估与种植体失败有中等程度的关联。与植入厚皮质层或致密骨的种植体相比,植入皮质骨薄的部位的种植体使患者失去至少一个种植体的几率增加了130%(比值比,2.3;95% 置信区间,1.0 - 5.4)。

结论

这项探索性研究表明,在种植体植入部位对骨质量进行简单的视觉评估对于种植体失败可能比在外周骨获得的pDEXA骨密度测量更具信息价值。为了确定外周骨质疏松测量与种植体丢失之间是否存在小或中等程度的关联,将需要进行更大样本量的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验