Suppr超能文献

永久性房室顺序起搏治疗药物难治性扩张型心肌病时对交感迷走神经平衡的调节

Modulation of the sympathovagal balance in drug refractory dilated cardiomyopathy, treated with permanent atrioventricular sequential pacing.

作者信息

Manolis A G, Liagas K, Katsivas A, Vassilopoulos C, Koutsogeorgis D, Louvros N

机构信息

Second Department of Cardiology, Hellenic Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Jpn Heart J. 2000 Jan;41(1):33-40. doi: 10.1536/jhj.41.33.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the long term efficacy of DDD pacing mode in selected patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) and drug refractory heart failure. The patients were evaluated according to the long term alteration of the sympathovagal balance (SVB). Patients with IDCM were considered eligible for DDD pacing if during temporary VDD pacing a 15% or more increase in the resting cardiac output was demonstrated. From the 29 patients studied, finally 20 patients (15M, 5F, 69 +/- 10 years) fulfilled the aforementioned criterion and therefore were considered candidates for permanent DDD pacing (NYHA class: 3.5 +/- 0.3, Ejection fraction: 27 +/- 7%, Resting cardiac index (CI) 2.6 +/- 0.4 l/min). The ECG of the patients demonstrated LBBB in 13, RBBB in 4 and RBBB + LAH in 3, with a PR interval of 232 +/- 28 ms and QRS duration of 138 +/- 15 ms. The pacemaker was programmed at 40-150 bpm, and AV delay of 105 +/- 20 ms. The lower heart rate programmed, in conjunction with the heart failure state of these patients, was responsible for essentially continuous atrial tracking, ventricular pacing. We evaluated the SVB in the pre- and post-implant periods (3rd and 6th month), using the hourly power spectral analysis (PSA) of heart rate variability during 24 hour Holter monitoring. As SVB we considered the ratio: low (0.04-0.15 Hz) to high frequency (0.15-0.40 Hz). We compared the SVB (LF/HF) during the day and night time for the pre- and post-implant periods. Post-pacing, the NYHA class was significantly improved (2.9 +/- 0.2 and 2.7 +/- 0.3 the 3rd and 6th month respectively). The mean heart rate was 78 +/- 8 bpm in the 3rd and 80 +/- 7 bpm in the 6th month postoperatively, which was lower than the 84 +/- 9 bpm preoperatively, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. During the night time the LF/HF decreased from 1.45 +/- 0.2 (LF: 7.19 +/- 0.43, HF: 4.95 +/- 0.54) in the pre-implant period to 0.9 +/- 0.09 (p < 0.001) (LF: 6.96 +/- 0.63, HF: 7.73 +/- 0.48) in the 3rd month. No further changes were observed in the 6th month (0.82 +/- 0.05, p = NS) (LF: 6.83 +/- 0.51, HF: 8.53 +/- 0.86) compared to the 3rd month. During the day time the LF/HF decreased from 1.5 +/- 0.5 (LF: 7.87 +/- 0.67, HF: 5.24 +/- 0.32) to 1.43 +/- 0.6 (p = NS) (LF: 7.34 +/- 0.71, HF: 5.24 +/- 0.42) in the 3rd month and to 1.41 +/- 0.09 in the 6th month (p = NS) (LF: 7.51 +/- 0.74, HF: 5.36 +/- 0.63). Comparing the LF/HF of day and the night time period, while in the pre-implant period there was no significant difference (1.5 +/- 0.5 vs 1.45 +/- 0.2, p = NS), the difference became significant in the 3rd (1.43 +/- 0.6 vs 0.9 +/- 0.09, p < 0.001) and 6th month (1.41 +/- 0.09 vs 0.82 +/- 0.05, p < 0.001). In conclusion, DDD pacing with individualized AV delay as an adjunct therapy could be a valuable method in selected patients with IDCM and drug refractory heart failure. DDD pacing improves the SVB over the long term. This improvement is attributed to sympathetic activity withdrawal and is more pronounced during night and less during day time.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估双腔(DDD)起搏模式对部分特发性扩张型心肌病(IDCM)和药物难治性心力衰竭患者的长期疗效。根据交感迷走神经平衡(SVB)的长期变化对患者进行评估。如果在临时心室按需(VDD)起搏期间静息心输出量增加15%或更多,则IDCM患者被认为适合进行DDD起搏。在研究的29例患者中,最终20例患者(15例男性,5例女性,年龄69±10岁)符合上述标准,因此被认为是永久性DDD起搏的候选者(纽约心脏协会分级:3.5±0.3,射血分数:27±7%,静息心脏指数(CI)2.6±0.4 l/min)。患者的心电图显示,13例为左束支传导阻滞(LBBB),4例为右束支传导阻滞(RBBB),3例为右束支传导阻滞合并左前分支阻滞(RBBB+LAH),PR间期为232±28 ms,QRS时限为138±15 ms。起搏器程控频率为40 - 150次/分钟,房室延迟为105±20 ms。较低的程控心率,结合这些患者的心力衰竭状态,导致基本持续的心房跟踪、心室起搏。我们在植入前和植入后(第3个月和第6个月),通过24小时动态心电图监测期间心率变异性的每小时功率谱分析(PSA)来评估SVB。作为SVB,我们考虑低频(0.04 - 0.15 Hz)与高频(0.15 - 0.40 Hz)的比值。我们比较了植入前和植入后白天和夜间的SVB(低频/高频)。起搏后,纽约心脏协会分级显著改善(第3个月和第6个月分别为2.9±0.2和2.7±0.3)。术后第3个月平均心率为78±8次/分钟,第6个月为80±7次/分钟,低于术前的84±9次/分钟,但这一差异未达到统计学意义。夜间,低频/高频比值从植入前期的1.45±0.2(低频:7.19±0.43,高频:4.95±0.54)降至第3个月的0.9±0.09(p<0.001)(低频:6.96±0.63,高频:7.73±0.48)。与第3个月相比,第6个月未观察到进一步变化(0.82±0.05,p=无统计学意义)(低频:6.83±0.51,高频:8.53±0.86)。白天,低频/高频比值从1.5±0.5(低频:7.87±0.67,高频:5.24±0.32)降至第3个月的1.43±0.6(p=无统计学意义)(低频:7.34±0.71,高频:5.24±0.42),第6个月降至1.41±0.09(p=无统计学意义)(低频:7.51±0.74,高频:5.36±0.63)。比较白天和夜间的低频/高频比值,植入前期无显著差异(1.5±0.5对1.45±0.2,p=无统计学意义),但在第3个月(1.43±0.6对0.9±0.09,p<0.001)和第6个月(1.41±0.09对0.82±0.05,p<0.001)差异变得显著。总之,对于部分IDCM和药物难治性心力衰竭患者,采用个体化房室延迟的DDD起搏作为辅助治疗可能是一种有价值的方法。DDD起搏可长期改善SVB。这种改善归因于交感神经活动的减退,且在夜间更为明显,白天则较弱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验