Bernheim Alain, Ammann Peter, Sticherling Christian, Burger Peter, Schaer Beat, Brunner-La Rocca Hans Peter, Eckstein Jens, Kiencke Stephanie, Kaiser Christoph, Linka Andre, Buser Peter, Pfisterer Matthias, Osswald Stefan
Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 3;45(9):1482-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.033.
We aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of right-atrial-paced (DDD) and right-atrial-sensed (VDD) biventricular paced rhythm on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves hemodynamics in patients with severe heart failure and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. However, the impact of active right atrial pacing on resynchronization therapy is unknown.
Seventeen CRT patients were studied 10 months (range: 1 to 46 months) after implantation. At baseline, the programmed atrioventricular delay was optimized by timing LV contraction properly at the end of atrial contraction. In both modes the acute hemodynamic effects were assessed by multiple Doppler echocardiographic parameters.
Compared to DDD pacing, VDD pacing resulted in much better improvement of intraventricular dyssynchrony assessed by the septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (VDD 106 +/- 83 ms vs. DDD 145 +/- 95 ms; p = 0.001), whereas the interventricular mechanical delay (difference between onset of pulmonary and aortic outflow) did not differ (VDD 20 +/- 21 ms vs. DDD 18 +/- 17 ms; p = NS). Furthermore, VDD pacing significantly prolonged the rate-corrected LV filling period (VDD 458 +/- 123 ms vs. DDD 371 +/- 94 ms; p = 0.0001) and improved the myocardial performance index (VDD 0.60 +/- 0.18 vs. DDD 0.71 +/- 0.23; p < 0.01).
Our findings suggest that avoidance of right atrial pacing results in a higher degree of LV resynchronization, in a substantial prolongation of the LV filling period, and in an improved myocardial performance. Thus, the VDD mode seems to be superior to the DDD mode in CRT patients.
我们旨在比较右心房起搏(DDD)和右心房感知(VDD)双心室起搏节律对心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的血流动力学影响。
心脏再同步治疗可改善重度心力衰竭和左心室(LV)不同步患者的血流动力学。然而,主动右心房起搏对再同步治疗的影响尚不清楚。
对17例CRT患者在植入后10个月(范围:1至46个月)进行研究。在基线时,通过在心房收缩末期恰当地调整左心室收缩时间来优化程控房室延迟。在两种模式下,均通过多个多普勒超声心动图参数评估急性血流动力学效应。
与DDD起搏相比,VDD起搏在通过室间隔至后壁运动延迟评估的室内不同步改善方面效果更佳(VDD 106±83毫秒 vs. DDD 145±95毫秒;p = 0.001),而室间机械延迟(肺动脉和主动脉流出起始之间的差异)无差异(VDD 20±21毫秒 vs. DDD 18±17毫秒;p = 无显著性差异)。此外,VDD起搏显著延长了心率校正的左心室充盈期(VDD 458±123毫秒 vs. DDD 371±94毫秒;p = 0.0001)并改善了心肌性能指数(VDD 0.60±0.18 vs. DDD 0.71±0.23;p < 0.01)。
我们的研究结果表明,避免右心房起搏可导致更高程度的左心室再同步、左心室充盈期的显著延长以及心肌性能的改善。因此,在CRT患者中,VDD模式似乎优于DDD模式。