Suppr超能文献

手术室床垫评估中界面压力的测量。

Measurement of interface pressures in the evaluation of operating theatre mattresses.

作者信息

Scott E M, Baker E A, Kelly P J, Stoddard E J, Leaper D J

机构信息

Unit of Surgery, North Tees Health NHS Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 1999 Oct;8(9):437-41. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1999.8.9.26200.

Abstract

This study compared the sacral interface pressures obtained in four mattresses (all supplied by the same manufacturer), in two positions adopted for surgical procedures, to determine the similarities and differences between them. The mattresses were all variations of the standard product used in operating departments. The null hypotheses were that there are no differences in interface pressures between the mattresses or between the two surgical positions, and that measurements are not influenced by subject body mass index. The measurement technology was also tested for reliability and suitability for intra-operative use. Sacral interface pressures of 25 healthy volunteers were recorded using each of the four mattresses (order individually randomised) in both the supine and the Lloyd Davies positions. A pressure-sensitive mat was used and one-way analysis of variance was the main statistical approach. Statistical significance was determined by p-values of < or = 0.05. One mattress recorded significantly lower interface pressures than the others and all pressures were influenced by body mass index. Surgical position was a significant factor, measurements in the Lloyd Davies position being 9.5-14.2% higher than in the supine position. The pressure measurement technique has proved to be reliable and easy to calibrate, position and use. Indications are that it can be used safely and effectively in operating departments. These results have implications for researchers and clinicians.

摘要

本研究比较了四种床垫(均由同一制造商提供)在两种手术体位下所获得的骶部界面压力,以确定它们之间的异同。这些床垫均为手术室使用的标准产品的变体。无效假设为床垫之间或两种手术体位之间的界面压力无差异,且测量不受受试者体重指数的影响。还对测量技术的可靠性和术中使用的适用性进行了测试。使用这四种床垫(顺序单独随机)分别在仰卧位和劳埃德·戴维斯位记录了25名健康志愿者的骶部界面压力。使用了一个压敏垫,主要统计方法是单因素方差分析。通过小于或等于0.05的p值确定统计学显著性。一种床垫记录的界面压力明显低于其他床垫,且所有压力均受体重指数的影响。手术体位是一个重要因素,劳埃德·戴维斯位的测量值比仰卧位高9.5 - 14.2%。压力测量技术已被证明可靠且易于校准、定位和使用。有迹象表明它可以在手术室安全有效地使用。这些结果对研究人员和临床医生具有启示意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验