Pring J, Millman P
Regional Rehabilitation Centre, Southern Birmingham Community NHS Trust, UK.
J Wound Care. 1998 Apr;7(4):173-4. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1998.7.4.173.
This evaluation compared the pressure support qualities of three mattresses by measuring the interface pressures using 20 subjects. The results indicate that the Pegasus Airwave mattress had significantly higher readings than Quattro DC2000 (p = 0.021, 95% confidence level) and the Nimbus II (p = 0.009, 99% confidence level) but that there is no significant difference between interface pressures for the Quattro DC2000 and the Nimbus II.
本评估通过对20名受试者测量界面压力，比较了三种床垫的压力支撑特性。结果表明，天马气流床垫的读数显著高于Quattro DC2000（p = 0.021，95%置信水平）和Nimbus II（p = 0.009，99%置信水平），但Quattro DC2000和Nimbus II的界面压力之间没有显著差异。
