Yu W K, Chow P K, Somanesan S, Ng T H, Sundram F X, Chan S T, Soo K C, Aw S E, Shaw S M
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Nucl Med Commun. 2000 Mar;21(3):269-76. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200003000-00011.
Clinically significant changes in hepatic haemodynamics accompany the development of portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases and liver cirrhoses, and after major liver resection. Hepatic blood flow parameters, such as hepatic arterial flow (HAF), hepatic portal flow (HPF), total hepatic blood flow (THBF) and hepatic perfusion index (HPI), are useful adjuncts to the diagnosis of liver pathology, the evaluation of disease progress and prognostication. Here, we describe a non-invasive method that combines the measurement of these parameters in a single study in real time. Red blood cells from eight pigs were labelled with 99Tc(m) using an in-vitro method and re-injected into the pigs. Data acquisition over the heart, lungs, liver and kidneys was started immediately and a blood sample was obtained 15 min post-injection. Hepatic arterial flow was determined from the ratio of the maximum gradients between the integrated time-activity curve of the left ventricle and the first-pass time-activity curve of the liver before the peak of the kidneys time-activity curve. The hepatic perfusion index was determined by comparing the slope of the liver time-activity curve before and after the kidney peak. Hepatic portal flow was determined from the hepatic arterial flow and the hepatic perfusion index, and total hepatic blood flow was determined as the sum of arterial and portal flow. The results were compared against those obtained from a clearance method using 99Tc(m)-DISIDA. The average hepatic perfusion index was 0.38, and the average hepatic arterial flow and hepatic portal flow were 168.3 +/- 52.9 and 274.6 +/- 60.1 ml x min(-1) respectively. The average total hepatic blood flow was 442.8 +/- 53.5 ml x min(-1), while the total hepatic flow determined by 99Tc(m)-DISIDA clearance was 419.7 +/- 62.6 ml x min(-1). No significant difference in total hepatic blood flow was found between the two methods. The results of this study show that it is possible to obtain all hepatic haemodynamics data in a single study using a non-invasive method.
肝血流动力学的显著变化伴随着门静脉高压症、肝细胞癌、肝转移瘤、肝硬化的发展,以及在肝大部切除术后出现。肝血流参数,如肝动脉血流(HAF)、肝门静脉血流(HPF)、肝总血流量(THBF)和肝灌注指数(HPI),是肝脏病理学诊断、疾病进展评估和预后判断的有用辅助手段。在此,我们描述一种非侵入性方法,可在单一研究中实时联合测量这些参数。使用体外方法用99Tc(m)标记八头猪的红细胞,然后重新注入猪体内。立即开始采集心脏、肺、肝脏和肾脏的数据,并在注射后15分钟采集血样。肝动脉血流通过左心室的积分时间-活性曲线与肝脏的首过时间-活性曲线之间的最大梯度之比来确定,该比值在肾脏时间-活性曲线峰值之前。肝灌注指数通过比较肾脏峰值前后肝脏时间-活性曲线的斜率来确定。肝门静脉血流由肝动脉血流和肝灌注指数确定,肝总血流量确定为动脉血流和门静脉血流之和。将结果与使用99Tc(m)-二乙基亚氨二乙酸(DISIDA)的清除法所获得的结果进行比较。平均肝灌注指数为0.38,平均肝动脉血流和肝门静脉血流分别为168.3±52.9和274.6±60.1 ml·min-1。平均肝总血流量为442.8±53.5 ml·min-1,而通过99Tc(m)-DISIDA清除法测定的肝总血流量为419.7±62.6 ml·min-1。两种方法在肝总血流量方面未发现显著差异。本研究结果表明,使用非侵入性方法在单一研究中获得所有肝血流动力学数据是可行的。