O'Connor M K, Krom R F, Carton E G, Sanchez-Urdazpal L, Juni J E, Ferguson D M, Wiesner R F
Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
J Nucl Med. 1992 Feb;33(2):239-45.
The ratio of hepatic arterial-to-portal venous blood flow can be determined from the analysis of a first-pass bolus through the liver by a number of techniques. This study examines the validity of four radiotracer techniques in an animal model. Thirty-four flow studies (3 mCi 99mTc-DTPA/study) were performed in seven anesthetized pigs. Images were acquired for 200 sec and time-activity curves were generated from lung, liver and kidney ROIs. These curves were analyzed using a slope-based (HPI), a height-based (mHAR) and two deconvolution-based methods employing exponential or gamma variate fits. There was an excellent correlation (r greater than 0.9) between results obtained with flow probes and the radiotracer techniques, with the exception of the HPI technique (r = 0.75). The mHAR and deconvolution techniques were inaccurate at very low and high arterial flows, due respectively to noise limitations and hemodynamic instability in the animal. Nevertheless, these techniques appear to be the most promising for routine clinical use.
肝动脉与门静脉血流之比可通过多种技术对肝脏进行首过团注分析来确定。本研究在动物模型中检验了四种放射性示踪技术的有效性。对七只麻醉猪进行了34次血流研究(每次研究使用3毫居里的99m锝-二乙三胺五乙酸)。采集图像200秒,并从肺、肝和肾感兴趣区生成时间-活性曲线。使用基于斜率的方法(肝灌注指数,HPI)、基于高度的方法(改良肝动脉放射性指数,mHAR)以及两种采用指数拟合或伽马变量拟合的反卷积方法对这些曲线进行分析。除HPI技术外(r = 0.75),血流探头与放射性示踪技术所得结果之间存在极好的相关性(r大于0.9)。mHAR和反卷积技术在极低和极高动脉血流时不准确,分别是由于动物中的噪声限制和血流动力学不稳定。然而,这些技术似乎最有希望用于常规临床应用。