Grab D, Flock F, Stöhr I, Nüssle K, Rieber A, Fenchel S, Brambs H J, Reske S N, Kreienberg R
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, Ulm, 89070, Germany.
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Jun;77(3):454-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5768.
The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) in the characterization of adnexal masses.
One hundred and one patients with asymptomatic adnexal masses, which were scheduled for laparoscopy, underwent preoperative transvaginal ultrasound, MRI, and 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET. Two different sonomorphological scoring systems were used to distinguish malignant from benign lesions. In addition, transvaginal Doppler flow velocimetry was performed and the resistance index (RI) of ovarian blood vessels was calculated. RI values below 0.45 were considered to indicate malignancy. MRI was evaluated on the basis of signal intensity and morphologic features such as wall thickness, septations, fluid or solid components, and vascularity. PET imaging was used to determine 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake. Malignancy was suspected if radiotracer uptake equaled or exceeded that of the liver. Based on histologic findings, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were first calculated independently for each imaging technique. Finally, a second session resulted in a consensus diagnosis being made based on the findings of all three modalities.
Sonographic evaluation of adnexal masses resulted in correct classification of 11 of 12 ovarian malignancies (sensitivity 92%) but with a specificity of only 60%. With MRI and PET, specificities improved to 84 and 80% respectively, but sensitivities decreased. When all imaging modalities were combined, sensitivity and specificity were 92 and 85%, respectively, and accuracy was 86%.
Combination of ultrasound with MRI and PET may improve accuracy in differentiation of benign from malignant ovarian lesions. However, negative MRI or PET results do not rule out early-stage ovarian cancer or borderline malignancies.
本研究旨在确定超声检查与磁共振成像(MRI)及正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在附件包块特征性诊断中的准确性。
101例计划接受腹腔镜检查的无症状附件包块患者,术前行经阴道超声、MRI及2-[(18)F]氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖PET检查。使用两种不同的超声形态学评分系统区分恶性与良性病变。此外,进行经阴道多普勒血流速度测定并计算卵巢血管的阻力指数(RI)。RI值低于0.45被认为提示恶性。根据信号强度及形态学特征如壁厚度、分隔、液体或实性成分及血管情况对MRI进行评估。PET成像用于确定2-[(18)F]氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖摄取情况。如果放射性示踪剂摄取等于或超过肝脏摄取,则怀疑为恶性。基于组织学结果,首先分别计算每种成像技术的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值及准确性。最后,基于所有三种检查方式的结果进行第二次会诊以达成共识诊断。
超声对附件包块的评估使12例卵巢恶性肿瘤中的11例得到正确分类(敏感性92%),但特异性仅为60%。MRI和PET的特异性分别提高到84%和80%,但敏感性降低。当所有成像方式联合使用时,敏感性和特异性分别为92%和85%,准确性为86%。
超声与MRI及PET联合使用可提高卵巢良恶性病变鉴别的准确性。然而,MRI或PET结果为阴性并不能排除早期卵巢癌或交界性恶性肿瘤。