Suppr超能文献

能量多普勒成像:作为颈动脉狭窄筛查检查的初步评估。

Power Doppler imaging: initial evaluation as a screening examination for carotid artery stenosis.

作者信息

Bluth E I, Sunshine J H, Lyons J B, Beam C A, Troxclair L A, Althans-Kopecky L, Crewson P E, Sullivan M A, Smetherman D H, Heidenreich P A, Neiman H L, Burkhardt J H

机构信息

Dept of Radiology, Ochsner Foundation Hosp, New Orleans, LA 70121-2484, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2000 Jun;215(3):791-800. doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn22791.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate power Doppler imaging as a possible screening examination for carotid artery stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the principal pilot study, a prospective, blinded comparison of power Doppler imaging with duplex Doppler imaging, the reference-standard method, was conducted in 100 consecutive patients routinely referred for carotid artery imaging at a large, private multispecialty clinic. In the validation pilot study, a prospective, blinded comparison of power Doppler imaging with digital subtraction angiography, the reference-standard method, was conducted in 20 consecutive patients routinely referred at a teaching hospital. Using conservative assumptions, the authors performed cost-effectiveness analysis.

RESULTS

Power Doppler imaging produced diagnostic-quality images in 89% of patients. When the images of the patients with nondiagnostic examinations were regarded as positive, power Doppler imaging had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, A(z), of 0.87, sensitivity of 70%, and specificity of 91%. The validation study results were very similar. The cost-effectiveness of screening and, as indicated, duplex Doppler imaging as the definitive diagnostic examination and endarterectomy was $47,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

CONCLUSION

The A(z) value for power Doppler imaging compares well with that for mammography, a generally accepted screening examination, and with most other imaging examinations. Power Doppler imaging is likely to be a reasonably accurate and cost-effective screening examination for carotid artery stenosis in asymptomatic populations.

摘要

目的

评估能量多普勒成像作为颈动脉狭窄可能的筛查检查方法。

材料与方法

在主要的初步研究中,对100例在一家大型私立多专科诊所常规接受颈动脉成像检查的连续患者,进行了能量多普勒成像与作为参考标准方法的双功多普勒成像的前瞻性、盲法比较。在验证性初步研究中,对20例在一家教学医院常规转诊的连续患者,进行了能量多普勒成像与作为参考标准方法的数字减影血管造影的前瞻性、盲法比较。作者采用保守假设进行了成本效益分析。

结果

能量多普勒成像在89%的患者中产生了诊断质量的图像。当将非诊断性检查患者的图像视为阳性时,能量多普勒成像的受试者操作特征曲线下面积A(z)为0.87,敏感性为70%,特异性为91%。验证性研究结果非常相似。筛查以及如所示将双功多普勒成像作为确定性诊断检查和内膜切除术的成本效益为每质量调整生命年47,000美元。

结论

能量多普勒成像的A(z)值与乳腺X线摄影(一种普遍接受的筛查检查)以及大多数其他成像检查的A(z)值相比具有优势。能量多普勒成像可能是无症状人群中颈动脉狭窄一种相当准确且具有成本效益的筛查检查方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验