Department of Cardiology and Angiology II, University Heart Center of Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany.
Department of Cardiology and Angiology II, University Heart Center of Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):386-396. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
The purpose was to analyze the agreement and binary accuracy of the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS) as determined by 4-dimensionally (4D) real-time gray-scale guided 3-dimensional (3D) color-Doppler ultrasonography (3DC-US) (4D/3DC-US) compared with catheter angiography (CA) and duplex ultrasonography (DUS). This study hypothesized that 4D/3DC-US is noninferior to CA and DUS in grading ICAS in selected patients.
Clinical stratification in patients with ICAS largely depends on a patient's symptomatic status and the degree of stenosis.
Screening with 4D/3DC-US was prospectively performed in 93 study patients (with 122 ICASs), thus yielding 80 patients for analysis (with 103 ICASs) after excluding patients with insufficient image quality, previous revascularization, and contraindications to CA. The ultrasound examination (10 MHz) consisted of consensus conform DUS examination and independent real-time 4D-guided gray-scale views for orientation followed by static 3DC-US NASCET (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial) percent stenosis quantification using off-line multiplanar rendering. Multiplanar selective CA of the same ICASs was quantified with dedicated software in a blinded fashion.
Quantitative CA of 103 stenoses with a mean degree of 65 ± 17% was compared with 4D/3DC-US, with a resulting concordance correlation coefficient of 0.89 and a standard deviation of differences (SDD) of 8.1% at a bias of +1.7%. Binary 50% and 70% stenosis detection with 4D/3DC-US revealed a sensitivity of 97% and 87%, respectively, and a specificity of 92% and 84%, respectively. Interobserver SDD for CA of 52 stenoses (7.2%) did not differ from SDD for 4D/3DC-US and CA (p = 0.274). Accuracy of 50% stenosis detection by 4D/3DC-US was tendentially higher compared with DUS (96% vs. 91%).
The 4D/3DC-US method provides reliable and accurate stenosis quantification and binary classification with good diagnostic accuracy compared with CA and DUS.
分析使用四维实时灰阶引导三维彩色多普勒超声(4D/3DC-US)检测颈动脉狭窄程度(ICAS)与导管血管造影(CA)和双功能超声(DUS)的一致性和二分法准确性。本研究假设,在选择的患者中,4D/3DC-US 在分级 ICAS 方面不劣于 CA 和 DUS。
ICAS 患者的临床分层主要取决于患者的症状和狭窄程度。
前瞻性对 93 例研究患者(122 处 ICAS)进行 4D/3DC-US 筛查,排除图像质量不足、既往血运重建和 CA 禁忌证的患者后,对 80 例患者(103 处 ICAS)进行分析。超声检查(10 MHz)包括共识 DUS 检查和独立实时 4D 引导的实时灰阶成像以进行定位,然后使用离线多平面重建进行静态 3DC-US NASCET(北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验)的狭窄百分比定量。以盲法方式使用专用软件对相同的 ICAS 进行多平面选择性 CA 定量。
对 103 处狭窄程度平均为 65±17%的狭窄处进行定量 CA 与 4D/3DC-US 进行比较,得到一致性相关系数为 0.89,差异标准差(SDD)为 8.1%,偏差为+1.7%。使用 4D/3DC-US 检测 50%和 70%狭窄的二分法检测显示,敏感性分别为 97%和 87%,特异性分别为 92%和 84%。对 52 处狭窄(7.2%)进行 CA 的观察者间 SDD 与 4D/3DC-US 和 CA 的 SDD 无差异(p=0.274)。与 DUS 相比,4D/3DC-US 检测 50%狭窄的准确性有趋势更高(96%比 91%)。
与 CA 和 DUS 相比,4D/3DC-US 方法提供了可靠和准确的狭窄定量和二分法分类,具有良好的诊断准确性。