Suppr超能文献

[植物状态。其诊断与治疗实践指南]

[Vegetative state. Practice guideline for its diagnosis and treatment].

作者信息

Martinelli G

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2000 Apr;66(4):173-5.

Abstract

Vegetative state (VS) is a clinical condition in which patients have lost both their consciousness content and alertness. So defined, it seems a simple diagnosis to achieve. However, facts disprove this idea, and indeed a striking evidence exists that doctors are unable to satisfactorily diagnose VS. In this series of 3 articles, a multi-disciplinary Italian working group proposes solutions in order to properly diagnose VS (Part I) and to differentiate it from other apparently similar situations (part II). Consciousness, coma and VS state are clearly defined and the reader is provided with easy-to-use methods to achieve the goal. Differential diagnosis includes the locked-in syndrome, the akinetic mutism, and the minimally conscious state, this latter being a challenging situation, which deserves great reader's attention. In the last part the authors afford the delicate argument on when and how a VS can be defined as permanent. Modern research on the use of magnetic resonance imaging in trauma patients and evoked potentials in anoxic patients are presented, and a flow-chart rationalizes the process of outcome prediction. Rehabilitation programs are also indicated to facilitate the continuum of care from the acute to post-acute phase. Lastly, the authors propose the problem of whether interventions are worth doing in such an extremely disabled population. No definite answers are given, and question remains open to discussion. It could not have been that so: doctors cannot be the only judge when a life worth living or not is to be sentenced.

摘要

植物状态(VS)是一种临床状况,患者在此状态下既丧失了意识内容又失去了警觉性。如此定义的话,似乎这是一个容易做出的诊断。然而,事实却反驳了这一观点,确实存在显著证据表明医生无法令人满意地诊断植物状态。在这三篇系列文章中,一个意大利多学科工作组提出了一些解决方案,以便正确诊断植物状态(第一部分)并将其与其他看似相似的情况区分开来(第二部分)。明确界定了意识、昏迷和植物状态,并且为读者提供了易于使用的方法来实现这一目标。鉴别诊断包括闭锁综合征、运动不能性缄默症和最低意识状态,后者是一种具有挑战性的情况,值得读者高度关注。在最后一部分,作者探讨了一个微妙的问题,即何时以及如何将植物状态定义为永久性的。介绍了关于在创伤患者中使用磁共振成像以及在缺氧患者中使用诱发电位的现代研究,并且一个流程图使结果预测过程合理化。还指出了康复计划,以促进从急性期到急性后期的连续护理。最后,作者提出了在这样一个极度残疾的人群中干预措施是否值得实施的问题。没有给出明确答案,这个问题仍有待讨论。事情不可能是这样的:在判定一个人是否值得活下去时,医生不能成为唯一的评判者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验